G
Guest
rgrunt:
Yes I think originally the wave vs. particle dispute was fueld by this seeming "paradox" but if memory serves me correctly, it has now become an issue of our inability to determined the time interval between cause and effect. i.e. the so called inability we suffer from to be able to measure acurately at the quantum level. The Heisenberg Principle if you will. The polarized double slit experiment produces results that for a while led some to speculate that events were occurring SIMULTANEOUSLY in two places at once.
This led to Wave Collapse Theory which Einstein called a "Spooky force at a distance" and never really bought into it as I recall.
It sounds to me a lot like you are headed in the direction of trying to tackle this problem. I'd say, "Good luck". Especially if you can pull it off.
When you say:
"...I believe that I may be on the track to solving this phenomenon or on the track to making a big scientific error."
My response is...
"Aren't we all my friend. Aren't we all".
(Smile)
admin:
Thank you for the recent post.
I too see this as a place of speculation and discovery. That's why I come here.
For what's it worth, I personally have never seen a problem with TT_0's posts since it's quite obvious that he is a fantasizer of fictional possibilities and quite a good one at that.
He seems polite to me, and I can't for one see what all the fuss is about. He does have creative ideas.
It's nice to remember to not take oneself TOO seriously here, but as rgrunt has pointed out, (in so many words), even being wrong is itself an educational experience.
Peace to all.
This is supposed to be a fun board. Lets have fun.
Besides, we're ALL amateurs here and we all know it.
Professional Quantum Theorists don't hang out on boards like this.
(Smile)
Yes I think originally the wave vs. particle dispute was fueld by this seeming "paradox" but if memory serves me correctly, it has now become an issue of our inability to determined the time interval between cause and effect. i.e. the so called inability we suffer from to be able to measure acurately at the quantum level. The Heisenberg Principle if you will. The polarized double slit experiment produces results that for a while led some to speculate that events were occurring SIMULTANEOUSLY in two places at once.
This led to Wave Collapse Theory which Einstein called a "Spooky force at a distance" and never really bought into it as I recall.
It sounds to me a lot like you are headed in the direction of trying to tackle this problem. I'd say, "Good luck". Especially if you can pull it off.
When you say:
"...I believe that I may be on the track to solving this phenomenon or on the track to making a big scientific error."
My response is...
"Aren't we all my friend. Aren't we all".
(Smile)
admin:
Thank you for the recent post.
I too see this as a place of speculation and discovery. That's why I come here.
For what's it worth, I personally have never seen a problem with TT_0's posts since it's quite obvious that he is a fantasizer of fictional possibilities and quite a good one at that.
He seems polite to me, and I can't for one see what all the fuss is about. He does have creative ideas.
It's nice to remember to not take oneself TOO seriously here, but as rgrunt has pointed out, (in so many words), even being wrong is itself an educational experience.
Peace to all.
This is supposed to be a fun board. Lets have fun.
Besides, we're ALL amateurs here and we all know it.
Professional Quantum Theorists don't hang out on boards like this.
(Smile)
Last edited: