Einstein
Timekeeper
Not if you're just a regular sheople. Those kind of people aren't the ones responsible. Of course I'm sure an activist could convince you otherwise.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
KerrTexas and Vodkafan
To begin with, I don't particularly care for people that have a terrorist agenda against our government. And people that use the John Titor story to present their political views against our government fall into that category. Usually the gullible are their prey.
So how could I do my part to stop these activists from preying on the gullible? Destroying credibility seems to be one avenue.
I suppose I could point out the obvious. These activists are from an enemy nation that don't like our American way of life. Freedom, capitalism, prosperity for all. Wouldn't that be great if you could convince the Americans to tear down their government? Conquer an enemy nation by getting its own people to do the job for you.
Of course if you prefer, I could just step back, and let the Hudson device take over.
Yes I have to agree E seems to jump to conclusions, make leaps past logic and makes a lot of incorrect assumptions. I see Einstein as more of a troll in this thread the J.T9663. And yes there is a fairly clear definition for Troll in the Internet age. See your beloved Wiki. So you may have been around here a lot longer Einstein and made a lot more posts than many people here but it doesn't mean you are entitled to bash everyone that comes along with an opinion. That is Trollish behavior. It's also one reason I quit posting here.With your logic just by me reading this person post I'm somehow starting a riot that will promote WWIII? Wow! I feel so special. Like I've finally really done something important with my life. Something historic.
BTW most of the top of heap energy researchers I have read consider the real Einstein to be wrong about a lot of things and that he also was 'persuaded' to misdirect people on certain concepts in order to conceal knowledge that might have lead to better energy sources (as well as better weapons). I consider the 2 guys on the right a lot better to follow than the guy on the left
Can you name these "top" researchers, provide their CV's and explain why you believe that Einstein concealed "certain concepts"? What were these concepts and where can we find evidence of the conspiracy? What specific "lot of things" was he wrong about and why? Can you provide links to accredited research that falsifies Einstein's theories (and I'm only assuming that you mean SR, GR, the photoelectric effect (1921 Nobel Prize), the basics of QM, atomic theory and mass-energy equivalence - his six basic theories).
Albert Einstein was a theoretical physicist. He was not and never claimed to be an applied physicist. Concealing knowledge that might lead to better energy sources/weapons, for example, was outside of his field of interest. The only weapons system that he ever worked on was in 1942 for the US Navy in an attempt to find out, from a physics POV, why our magnetic torpedo proximity fuses were failing to detonate the torpedoes when contacting Japanese shipping/warships.
He was a German emigre and the FBI didn't fully trust him. He was also a Jew and FDR was known to be an anti-Semite. FDR didn't trust him. He wasn't allowed to work on any advanced weapons systems during WWII. He was also a pacifist and had no interest in working on weapons systems. His only involvement other than the torpedoes was in 1939 when Leo Szilard contacted him for himself, Edward Teller and Eugene Wigner to ask him to sign their letter to FDR warning about Germany's fission bomb research program.
The German fission bomb program points to why you don't make unfounded assumptions about specific abilities and put theoretical physicists in charge of applied physics programs simply because they are brilliant and famous. Werner Heisenberg was tasked with the project of building a nuclear reactor and obtaining a controlled, sustained chain reaction fission of uranium-235. As it turned out he was never even close. The German program was an utter failure from the beginning. Heisenberg was not qualified for the project, no matter how brilliant and famous. He was a theorist, not a particle physicist specializing in nuclear fission.
And I'll add this final note:
This is a time travel site. Time travel is a branch of theoretical physics. What do all, and I mean literally all, time travel theories have in common? They spring directly from Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. There's no other theory that allows any form of time travel - not even to the future. So, if you're on a time travel site and you want to choose "the 2 guys on the right" over Einstein maybe you're on the wrong forum.
I'm going to take a wild guess and propose that you've never read Einstein's original paper on Special Relativity ("On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies"). You take the 2 guys on the right but you've never done any independent research into the facts. You read alt-sci Internet articles and let them decide for you. Am I close?
Where and When have you been???Sorry I took so long to get back
Not particularly. Though the incident may be moved to Sat 28th, possibly due to rehearsals.
Appears there were no tears in regard to your fears.