Hello everyone, I have been researching for a long time and I realized that in the end, electricity should definitely be used for time travel and teleportation, not the speed of light. This requires experiments with electricity, and experiments require a lot of money. Unfortunately, although I have been thinking and brainstorming about wormholes and time travel for a long time, at the same time, with all this enthusiasm for continuing research, it is not possible for me to reach the final result without experiments. Not only me, but no one gets anywhere without experiments. Scientific hypotheses such as moving at the speed of light or mass at the level of a black hole are all unrealistic and must be fundamentally revised. I even have opinions on wormholes. As an interested person, considering the existing knowledge and all the evidence and clues without any laboratory, I have studied enough in the field of theory, imagination and real clues, and now I definitely need to experiment with electricity, which is not possible for me without money. So I suggest that if you are really serious about these topics, then focus only on electromagnetism! Not raw assumptions.
Welcome to TTI! I’ve translated the thread title and the title of the original post here to English. Please try to remember to post in English, since this is mostly an English-speaking site, and translating from a foreign language can currently be quite tedious. Thank you! 
I am interested and in for this research,
I lost my mom in hospital because of doctor’s high antibiotics dosage., i will make sure i will take all possible effort to go back in time and save my mom and create a new timeline.
People will keep laughing but i am still interested in research, do you have any group or how do we get together as entire community.
Why? What is it about electromagnetism that sets it apart from the rest of physics that results in some form of time travel? Have you checked arXiv to see if others have already or are in the process of exploring time travel theory based on E&M?
arXiv (Cornell University): https://arxiv.org/ When searching select Title and input “time travel” as the search criteria.
Well, I have nothing to do with other people’s research or secret thoughts, electromagnetism is the basis of time travel and teleportation technology, the universe is fundamentally made of matter and energy, and any method of time travel is based on mass and energy, and therefore requires energy, and the solution to that is electromagnetic energy, something that exists everywhere and is available to everyone.
Electromagnetism is one of the four fundamental forces along with the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and gravity.
Gravity is the curvature of spaceTIME, whereby we can time travel into the future via time dilation and hypothetically time travel into the past via wormholes and closed timelike curves (CTCs).
The Roadblocks: Quantum Mechanics and Chronology Protection
While General Relativity permits these geometric structures, nature seems to fight back when we try to build a time machine:
-
Exotic Matter: To keep a wormhole stable and prevent its throat from collapsing instantly into a black hole, it requires a negative energy density—a substance with negative mass known as “exotic matter.” While tiny quantum fluctuations can produce localized negative energy (like the Casimir effect), it is unknown if macroscopically stable amounts can exist.
-
The Chronology Protection Conjecture: Physicist Stephen Hawking proposed that the laws of quantum mechanics will always conspire to prevent time travel to the past. Specifically, as a wormhole forms a time loop, virtual particles (vacuum fluctuations) would circulate through the loop infinitely, creating a catastrophic feedback loop of energy that destroys the wormhole instantly.
If gravity could be coupled with electromagnetism in order to make it polarized and give gravity the strength of electromagnetism then it becomes much easier to create CTCs(closed timelike curves).
For a CTC to exist, you need a spacetime manifold where the light cone structure tilts enough, continuously, to allow a future-directed path to loop back. The specific mechanism:
-
In Kerr geometry, the ergosphere region tilts light cones in the φ (azimuthal) direction due to frame dragging
-
If you can control that tilt — polarize it, steer it — you’re essentially steering the causal structure
-
EM-strength gravity would allow this tilt to be achieved at macroscopic but laboratory scales
This connects directly to Tipler’s cylinder result: an infinitely long rotating dense cylinder creates CTCs in its vicinity because the frame dragging wraps the local causal structure. With EM-strength gravitomagnetism, you wouldn’t need infinite length — the curvature per unit length would be enormous by comparison.
The Missing Piece: How to Actually Couple Them
This is where it gets speculative but interesting. Several candidate mechanisms exist:
Kaluza-Klein compactification at accessible scales — if the 5th dimension isn’t compactified at the Planck scale but at some larger scale, the coupling between gravity and EM becomes physically accessible. The “radius” of compactification sets the coupling strength.
Metamaterial spacetime analogs — this is directly relevant to your Sailing Theorem work. Specially engineered media with extreme permittivity/permeability tensors can simulate effective metrics. A material that couples EM fields to effective gravitational potentials could — in principle — produce local regions of CTC-favorable geometry.
Vacuum Resonance
Resonance in classical physics occurs when a driving frequency matches a system’s natural frequency, producing large-amplitude response. Vacuum resonance applies this logic to the quantum vacuum itself — the idea that under the right conditions, external fields or boundary geometries can coherently excite specific vacuum modes, producing amplified or qualitatively new physical effects.
f/a=dv=e/c². You get it.
I could be wrong. But, I always thought that gravity was actually a form of density at work &/or/both electromagetism, heck… imho, they could be even the same thing. The stronger/more powerful the object density, the “so called” strength/power of the somethings internal gravity & anything flowing through it, or… around it if strong enough? I missed this class. 
That may be exactly why waves patterns can interfere? idk. Just my best guessing again. i would trust an “alternative” expert, long before… me here. 
I didn’t get down this far… yet. I will still leave my little “chimed~in” info’s.
Just cause! <~ I didn’t have to backspace, or… correct it later! 
First time, for everything… right!!! 
~QS
Note: Not quite sure I have been helping today. but i’m having fun all the same!
Gravity is extremely weak. the only reason we feel it on Earth is because of the mass of the Earth produces enough spacetime curvature to keep us on its surface.
To put its weakness into perspective, think about a simple refrigerator magnet. When you stick a tiny magnet onto a fridge, that minuscule piece of metal easily defeats the gravitational pull of the entire planet Earth acting on it.
The only reason gravity rules the cosmos—keeping us on the ground, the Moon in orbit, and the Earth tethered to the Sun—is because of two unique properties:
-
It is purely attractive: Unlike the electromagnetic force, which has positive and negative charges that cancel each other out on a macro scale, gravity only pulls. It never pushes away.
-
It has infinite range: Every single speck of matter adds to the total gravitational field, and it accumulates indefinitely.
Because the Earth is an enormous collection of roughly 5.97 × 10²⁴ kilograms of matter, all those trillions of atoms add up to create a collective curvature in the fabric of spacetime. What we perceive as a heavy, relentless pulling force is actually just our bodies trying to follow a straight path (a geodesic) through a spacetime grid that has been severely bent by the Earth’s massive bulk.
Without that astronomical amount of concentrated mass, gravity’s microscopic weakness would make it practically unnoticeable to us.
If the research is published on arXiv.org then by definition it isn’t “secret”. It is very public.
I read through the post a few times and, I’m sorry, it didn’t make any sense to me. So I’ll ask you this: Is the fully honest answer that while you have some ideas you’ve never studied physics in any formal setting? And please, in your answer, if you choose to answer, don’t land on John Baez’s “Crackpot Index” with something along the lines of No 15 (10 points) “I’m not good at math, but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone to express it in terms of equations.” or No 16 “arguing that a current well-established theory is “only a theory”, as if this were somehow a point against it”. 
Simply stating time travel needs energy is a truism that doesn’t add anything of interest to the discussion. EM theory isn’t the basic for time travel. The basic theory is one of an infinite number of solutions to General Relativity (Einstein), not Electromagnetic Theory (Maxwell). Yes, we can get useful energy from electricity and convert it to units of work. But how, precisely, does that translate to time travel?
If you look you will find a connection between time and EM Theory in Special Relativity. I just gave you three theories and the names of two physicists. From there you should take the deeper dive to discover for yourself the connection. You might be surprised. If I do it for you you’ll miss all the fun.