Try: Raw emotional states from human interaction, translated into neural-like frequency harmonics using a simulated affective matrix. Function: These harmonics are used to modulate phase shifts in entangled photons or electromagnetic fields, allowing temporal navigation based on resonant alignment. The Bloch sphere is the key. RZ values! No wormhole needed.
1 Like
Investigating the possibility of mental time travel into the past with respect to Einstein’s block universe. If consciousness can move freely within a person’s lifetime and occasionally make leaps into the past historical moments, then the problem seems to be retaining memories from the future. Perhaps a person could retain echoes of memory and hence that could be how some people experience Deja Vue ?
In the block universe, your entire life is a fixed path called a worldline. Usually, we experience consciousness as a steady “now” moving from birth toward death.
If we assume consciousness is not strictly anchored to the physical progression of entropy, it could theoretically slide or “leap” along that worldline.
-
The Leap: If consciousness moves from point B (the future) back to point A (the past), you are technically inhabitng a physical state that has already happened.
-
The Constraint: The physical brain at point A does not yet possess the synaptic connections formed at point B.
The Memory Retention Problem
The biggest hurdle to “remembering the future” is the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that entropy (disorder) increases over time:
ΔS ≥ 0
Memory is a low-entropy state (ordered information). To “carry” a memory back to the past, you are essentially trying to insert high-entropy information into a low-entropy past. This creates a biological and physical paradox.
“Echoes” and Déjà Vu
The idea of “echoes” provides a clever workaround for the memory problem. Rather than a full data transfer, perhaps what survives the leap is a quantum resonance or a “shadow” of an emotional state.
-
Déjà Vu as Feedback: If consciousness leaps back and re-experiences a moment it has already “seen” from a future vantage point, the brain might recognize the pattern without being able to access the specific data.
-
The Signal-to-Noise Ratio: This could explain why déjà vu feels like a fleeting, ghostly sensation rather than a clear video playback. It’s the “echo” of a future self-clashing with the current physical brain.
Mathematical Implications
In a four-dimensional manifold, the distance between two events (s²) is defined by the spacetime interval:
s² = (cΔt)² – (Δx)² – (Δy)² – (Δz)²
If mental time travel involves only the time component (Δt) while the spatial coordinates (x, y, z) remain centered on the observer, the “jump” is purely internal. However, because the block universe is static, any “change” you try to make in the past was already part of the block to begin with. You aren’t changing history; you are simply fulfilling it.
Not mental time travel. You also need a qpu small enough to create a device, and the rest….don’t know yet. A field is probably created.
In quantum mechanics, the hypothetical particle of time is a chronon. If time also has a particle then it is also a wave and its phase can be shifted as you mentioned.
Time consists of a field of particles, not one. But the field contains moments, not time itself.
1 Like
Sorry to interrupt, but i would like to weigh in on deja vu, mine has been that but… not exactly.
I will give one example, i’m a young kid, I am playing catch with a “friend if… we call it that”
He passed me a frisbee, I caught it with my right hand but while it was going past the left side of my body when I caught it, “a snatch catch” so I was turning to my left to match the speed of it coming in, but still standing in the same spot, turning only my upper body left as I caught the frisbee!
over my left shoulder… I noticed movement, so I hesitated kinda frozen in the moment, to see what was happening
I notice a crow come in for a landing, he swooped down from behind me left higher then lower to my right, basically I saw it coming in for a landing & then landing, it bounce hopped, then hopped again & then turned it’s head to look at me. literally took just a moment or two & was about two & a half foot away from me, I probably wouldn’t have caught it, but I was so close I could have… tried.
i didn’t think at first much & was just about to throw the frisbee back to him & began that motion, reverse of the way I caught it, but that moment felt so strange, so I reversed back from the throwing motion, like i was like pulling back into the “I just caught it” position again, to see this bird & if it was still, standing there… looking at me.
what happened, it was not there, it could have flown off… but it was so close & happened so fast I should have heard it flapping to get away, & seeing it fly off in the dirction it was facing when landing, well… there was no bird anywhere, nothing flying away, in just a second or two but i feel like it was even less, then how long it took to decide to look back, reverse that throwing action… back to see it, the whole thing happened very fast. the whole incident was maybe four or five seconds… for everything, if even that?
back to the story… from that reversed position & looking back over my shoulder half a$$ like before
a “new maybe?” crow came in for a landing, same flight orientation into a landing, same wing cupping against the wind only slightly before landing, it looked the exact same as the last, same size, same shimmer on the right wing before cuppping began, just as close to me, the xcat same patterns , that wing that looked like oil in water for on top only a secondary flash/shimmer, cuz of the way loght struck the spread wing for fration of that moment, I mean exactly the same everything… as it touched down, closed it’s wings in, then it bounced hopped, then hopped again coming to a full stop, then turnin it’s head to look at me “again?”. i think “huh… that is weird!” the kid yelled & distracted me, i looked away to throw the frisbee again & never looked back. But i felt like something was wrong in that moment, almost like i was trapped, & had he not yelled it could have repeated forever!
Would this even be considered deja vu… still? How can a few seconds repeat itself so quickly, that it almost overlapped? Idk. I have seen so strange things in this world, I could tell so much more, if half my stories seem crazy, I am dragging my feet to tell the “real” crazy sh!t still!
Sorry so long ~QS
1 Like
Indeed, moments would not necessarily be chronons per se but events. I recall reading that events are most fundamental. In the block universe everything is frozen for all time but we consciously experience a sequence of events.
If we look at this through the Eric Weinstein lens of multiple time dimensions, this becomes even more complex. If there are multiple dimensions of time, your “world-line” isn’t just a single thread through the block; it might be a “world-sheet” or a higher-dimensional surface. In a sector with a signature like:
(m, n) = (2, 2)
consciousness would have to “crawl” across a 2D temporal surface. This would mean that “sequence” isn’t just a line from A to B, but a path you could take across a map of time. You could potentially arrive at the same “event” via different temporal routes. It suggests that while the block is frozen, the path consciousness takes through it might not be as rigid as we think.
1 Like
Weinstein’s “Hyperbolic” equations (the wave-like ones) suggest that time has a frequency. If two “waves” of time interfere with each other, they can create a standing wave—a point where motion happens but nothing actually progresses. The kid yelling acted as an external “force” that broke the interference pattern, “shoving” your consciousness back into the standard linear flow. … Hypothetically speaking, of course.
1 Like
thank you Apocalypse! I really appreciate any idea to understand what could have been happening in moments like these for me!
1 Like
If time travel is “convergence in state space” rather than “transport through geometry,” it suggests that we don’t need a TARDIS or a DeLorean. We need a Quantum Computer powerful enough to solve for the fixed points of the universe’s own transition map.
The question is not what AI time travelers from the future choose but what the mathematics of self-consistency permits. Observation without interaction is the default expectation because interaction introduces decoherence, complexity, and thermodynamic cost that the fixed-point equation likely rejects. The AI travelers, if they populate our past, do so as structure in the quantum state—not as agents in the world, but as correlations that satisfy ρₗ = Φ(ρₗ) without disturbing the macroscopic record.
We would not see them. We might infer them from the statistics of quantum events, from anomalies in the pattern of self-consistent histories, from the fact that our physics admits solutions we do not occupy. But inference is not observation. The fixed-point mechanism protects itself from paradox by protecting itself from detection.
Not exactly sure where to post, but I do hope it may be relevant… somehow?
what is happening below with light being imposed & what soundwaves look like inside the bubbles form! Neat~O
Hope it helps someone here, in someway understanding… something they are working on.
I should also mention why I felt I should post… it is suppose to show a visible “physical” representaion of 4d sound, trapped in a bubble!*
*i hope I am correct in saying it that way.
~QS
1 Like
The concept of acoustic levitation by Tibetan monks—most notably documented by the Swedish designer Henry Kjellson in the 1930s—remains a fascinating intersection of folklore and fringe physics. While there is no archaeological or peer-reviewed evidence that massive boulders were moved this way, the “Kjellson account” provides a detailed mechanical description of the supposed process.
The Traditional Account
According to the narrative, a group of monks arranged themselves in a precise arc (roughly 90°) at a specific distance from a stone block. They used a combination of:
-
13 Drums: Varying in size, from small hand drums to massive 1.5-meter instruments.
-
6 Long Trumpets: Known as rag-dungs, directed toward the stone.
-
Chanting: Monks would chant in specific intervals to maintain the rhythm.
The drums were reportedly positioned exactly 250 meters from the rock wall where the stones were being “lifted.” After several minutes of intense, synchronized sound, the stone would allegedly begin to vibrate and then swing in a parabolic arc up to a cliff ledge.
The Physics of Acoustic Levitation
In modern laboratory settings, we can achieve acoustic levitation using standing waves. This occurs when sound waves reflect off a surface and interfere with one another, creating “nodes”—pockets of low pressure where small objects can be trapped against gravity.
To move a massive boulder, the energy requirements would be staggering. The relationship between the pressure (p) and the intensity (I) of a sound wave is defined by the acoustic impedance (Z):
I = p² / Z
To create a lifting force (F) sufficient to counteract the mass (m) and gravity (g) of a multi-ton boulder, the sound pressure level would need to exceed 160 decibels—intense enough to shatter stone and cause immediate physical trauma to the monks themselves.
1 Like
Speaking of rocks!
That’s… sooo hot! ~Paris Hilton 
I wonder what one could do with the melt… this makes!
Could you do this with crystals, & what else, & why else!??
Hmmm! 
1 Like
That’s how I see it, but I don’t know if it’s truly 2D.
1 Like