Entropicification: universes as crystals frozen from an entangled ocean

Science
, ,
1

Reality at its deepest level is not space, time, or matter — it’s pure relationship. Everything is connected to everything else simultaneously, with no distance between anything, in a vast ocean of correlation. Space and time as we experience them don’t exist at this level. What exists is a kind of maximally entangled wholeness, where nothing is separate from anything else.

Universes emerge from this ocean the way ice crystals form from water — a spontaneous organizing event where the formless becomes structured, local, and governed by cause and effect. What we call the Big Bang was that freezing moment. The universe you live in, with its stars and physics and distances, is one crystal among potentially many that have frozen out of the same underlying ocean simultaneously. Each crystal is internally consistent and obeys its own local rules, but cannot communicate with the others because there’s no spatial gap between them — they’re just different organized patterns of the same underlying reality.

Everything that happens in a universe — every black hole, every death of a star, ultimately the heat death of the cosmos itself — is part of a process called entropicification: the slow, irreversible dissolving of local structure back into the nonlocal ocean. Information doesn’t disappear during entropicification; it gets scrambled into correlations so vast and nonlocal that no observer inside the crystal can read them anymore. When entropicification is complete, the crystal has fully melted — and the ocean, now carrying everything that universe ever was encoded in its correlations, can freeze again. A new Big Bang. A new crystal. The cycle has no location and no clock. It simply is, over and over, universes blooming and dissolving through entropicification like ice forming and melting in an ocean that was never not there.

Within any given crystal, quantum mechanics reveals that the freezing process was never perfectly clean. Every time a quantum event occurs — a particle measured, a choice made, an atom decaying — the crystal doesn’t simply pick one outcome. It branches. What the Everett interpretation, or Many Worlds, describes is the continuous fracturing of a single crystal into an ever-growing tree of slightly different crystals, all sharing the same root in the original symmetry breaking event but diverging with every quantum fork in the road. In this model those branches are not separate universes in the full sense — they are internal structure within a single frozen phase of the nonlocal ocean, like the microscopic grain boundaries and defects inside one large ice crystal. They share the same underlying nonlocal ground, the same ocean, the same entropicification endpoint. Every branch will eventually melt back into the same water.

Traveling between branches of the same crystal is a fundamentally different proposition than crossing between entirely separate universes, and in some ways it is the more tractable problem. The branches share the same nonlocal ground, the same original symmetry breaking event, the same underlying ocean — which means the correlation structure between them is not absent but merely suppressed by decoherence, the process by which quantum branches stop interfering with each other and begin to behave as separate classical realities. A navigation system working at this level would not need to fully exit the crystal and touch the open ocean. It would need to locally reverse decoherence — to re-entangle a region with the branch structure of the crystal itself, making adjacent branches momentarily accessible, and then allowing re-crystallization into a chosen branch rather than the default one. This is still extraordinarily difficult by any current measure of technology, but it is at least a problem with a definable target: the branch you want to reach exists, it shares your physics, and the path to it runs through the internal quantum structure of your own universe rather than through the formless void of the nonlocal ground itself.

1 Like
2

The more I look for ways to design a time machine that can travel into the past, the more it seems to be impossible; even traveling to the past of a branch on the universe crystal seems to be impossible.

1 Like
3

I understand your pain, I hope you are not giving up on trying.

Do you better feel you have enough information to create a working code for a time machine to at least run properly, or did you feel that was done already?, I mean with what else you have seen lately?

You are so good at what you do. I would be sad, if you felt it was meaningless… to try still.

Take a break if you need one, re~gather.

Try again.

We all need breaks to see things clearly, when we are headlong into the forest & can’t see through those trees. Back out/up a bit, try a fresh perspective.

Just a thought, Sincerely your friend :heart: ~QS

1 Like
4

if positrons are just mirror reflections of electrons, not electrons going backwards through time then that means even quantum particles cannot time travel into the past.

1 Like
5

I may be a silly nobody!

I believe, I truly believe… every single one of us is here for a reason, & are here because we need/are suppose… to be.

Don’t give up, that doesn’t sound like fun… Apocalypse! You think so well outside of the box! We need you.

Maybe a little silly advice might help, if you want to continue the time travel machine part, maybe… this will help.

Maybe we have all the info we need, we just have to figure it out for ourselves.

Keep in mind Cern is only a few years off from figuring it out. We could wait, or… we could figure what to try for them. Then send an envoy to help with where to look at. Then we can build the code it needs still.

How many elements are there, have we tried using the idea we were offered, on all of them. Maybe just maybe… if we do as suggested, we can make a the proper, or… new element, a stable version. A real one that is needed for it.

Maybe the element we need has been hiding here all along, who knows. We shouldn’t lose hope. It Time_travel says we should try, why shouldn’t we.

Why waste nearly thirty years leading people wrong.

What’s the worst that could happen, we look silly. What is the best thing… WE… Help Create Time Travel Together!

A little out~of~box thinking, always helps. :smiley: ~QS

Note: Eitherway, we are having fun here. Just don’t let it get you down.

1 Like
6

Finding novel ways to time travel into the future appears to be a more viable method of time travel.

Through multiple independent lines of reasoning — thermodynamic irreversibility, Wheeler-DeWitt timelessness, quantum teleportation protocol requirements, microphysical particle behavior, the structural properties of RCO’s modular automorphism flow, and the near impossibility of microsingularity production — we have systematically closed every known approach to past-directed travel. This is not a failure of imagination but a convergent result pointing at something structurally true about temporal asymmetry.

Every prohibition that applies to past-directed travel is a statement about the irreversibility of correlation basin evolution — one cannot return to an attractor that has already partially dissolved. Future-directed travel faces none of these prohibitions because it moves with the modular automorphism flow rather than against it. Physics does not forbid future-directed travel — it practically demonstrates it through relativistic time dilation, which is confirmed experimentally.

1 Like
7

Then we focus on moving forward in the time~travel thinking.

If we can demonstrate that, just maybe… backwards will show itself being quite naturally, the next step we see. :hugs: ~QS

1 Like
8

@Apocalypse - Are you only working within conventional science, or science that’s been accepted by the scientific community (AKA mainstream science)? If so, I think it’s time to start thinking outside the box.

@QuantumSoundwave - Yeah, one must get to the future first in order to travel back to the past.

1 Like
9

Time doesn’t flow through the universe like a river through a landscape. Time is the landscape — and the landscape is made of disorder (entropy).

Think of every possible state the universe could be in as a vast terrain. Some states are highly ordered — low entropy, like a pristine unshuffled deck of cards. Some states are deeply disordered — high entropy, like that same deck after a thousand shuffles. The universe is always rolling downhill on this terrain, from order toward disorder. That rolling — that direction of increasing disorder — is what we experience as time passing.

The shape of that terrain is the shape of time. Where the terrain has an edge — a hard boundary you can’t go past — time has a beginning. That’s the Big Bang. Not an explosion that happened in time, but the edge of the terrain itself. There’s no “before” the Big Bang for the same reason there’s no land past the edge of a cliff — the terrain simply stops there.

When the terrain undergoes a dramatic reorganization — a sudden shift in the landscape, like water freezing into ice — time itself undergoes a structural change at that moment. The universe doesn’t just pass through that event. The nature of time’s flow reorganizes around it.

And here is the deepest part: the mathematical object that generates the flow of time turns out to be, exactly and precisely, the mathematical object that measures disorder. Time is not something separate that entropy happens to increase along. Time is the flow of entropy itself — the universe’s ceaseless rolling from order toward disorder isn’t happening in time. It is time.

The shape of time is read directly off the shape of disorder. Not imposed from outside. Not assumed in advance. Derived from the structure of the universe’s own unfolding.

To travel into the past of this landscape would mean rolling uphill — from disorder back toward order. Not just locally, not just in one small region, but everywhere simultaneously. Every shuffled deck would have to unshuffled itself. Every broken egg would have to reassemble. Every memory you have — which is itself a physical record, a pattern stamped into matter — would have to un-form, because memories are downstream of events, and reversing time means erasing everything downstream.

The problem isn’t that uphill is steep. The problem is that there is no uphill. The terrain doesn’t have a slope going both directions. It only has one direction of descent, and that direction is what we mean by “forward.” The past isn’t behind you on the same terrain — it’s the terrain that generated the terrain you’re standing on. It’s not a place you can walk back to. It’s the process that made the ground beneath your feet.

What About Shortcuts?

Every proposed mechanism for past-directed travel runs into the same wall dressed in different clothes.

Closed loops in spacetime — paths that curve back and meet themselves — sound like they might let you revisit the past. But a loop doesn’t go backward on the terrain. It goes forward all the way around until it arrives back where it started. The disorder kept increasing the entire time you were traveling the loop. You didn’t go back uphill. You went around a hill and found yourself at the same elevation you began.

Quantum tunneling — where particles pass through barriers that should be impassable — lets you cross barriers in space, not barriers in the direction of disorder. The particle that tunnels through a wall is still aging. The terrain is still descending. Tunneling is a shortcut across the landscape, not a reversal of its slope.

Parallel universes — other branches of reality that split off from our own — share the same past up to the point where they diverged, and after that their pasts are not places that exist anywhere in our geometry. They are what would have happened. You cannot visit what would have happened because it was never written into the landscape — it was the road not taken, and untaken roads leave no terrain behind them.

The Deepest Answer

The past is not a region of the landscape you can navigate to. It is the process by which the landscape came to have the shape it has right now.

Asking how to travel into the past of this terrain is like asking how to travel into the force of gravity that shaped a canyon. The canyon is here. The geological forces that carved it are not somewhere else on the map — they are why the map looks the way it does. You can study them, reconstruct them, model them. You cannot visit them, because visiting requires being in the terrain, and the terrain is always only the present moment of the descent.

Time moves in one direction because disorder only increases in one direction. And disorder only increases in one direction because the universe began at the one point on the terrain that was as ordered as it could possibly be — the top of the only hill that ever existed. Everything since then has been the universe finding its way down.

You cannot go back to the top of that hill. The hill is gone. The going-down is what made everything that exists.

1 Like
10

Lets not focus on the past, I understand you are losing any faith it is possible to travel back.

Again, let’s just forget the past, for now.

Is there a way to travel forward, faster instead. You have said it is possible, so does evidences bases.

Focus on how to get there* & what are the possible ways to get there as quickly as possible, but safely.

If travel backward is possible, then maybe… we can only see it from a forward facing perspective.

Until then, as you said… it doesn’t even exist then, since we are already here/now instead. :growing_heart:~QS

*Sorry, I did not mean that to come off wrong.
Nor, anything I say… if I have! Forgive me Apocalypse. Just In Case.

11

Time is an investment and there is no going back.

Past-directed time travel with a conscious passenger requires two things simultaneously: a causality-preserving shell that maintains a forward-directed entropy pocket in perfect isolation from its surroundings while remaining physically embedded in those surroundings — which is internally contradictory — and a global reversal of every quantum correlation in the universe simultaneously, which requires an operator external to the universe with complete access to its total quantum state. The first requirement is self-defeating. The second requirement is indistinguishable from what theologians would call omnipotence. Past-directed time travel is therefore not a problem of physics or engineering. It is a demand that the universe be operated on from outside itself — by something that is not subject to the laws that make time travel necessary in the first place.

An investment is irreversible by nature. You commit resources — energy, order, structure — and what you get back is never the same form you put in. The return is always transformed, always downstream, always shaped by everything that happened between the investment and the outcome. You cannot uninvest. You cannot retrieve the original capital in its original form. The act of investing changes the landscape permanently.

This is exactly what the universe does with every moment.

Every instant of time is the universe spending its one non-renewable resource — order. The extraordinary low-entropy state at the beginning was the principal. Everything since has been the spending of it. Every star that burns, every thought that forms, every correlation that entangles — these are the investments being made, moment by moment, from a finite original endowment that can never be restored.

1 Like
12

Here’s my belief in a nutshell: the mainstream science we are taught in school is riddled with lies, pseudoscience, and propaganda. Also, it would be a very arrogant assumption to think that today’s scientists know everything about how the universe works. I also believe that the notion that the powers that be are telling us 100% of their knowledge is foolish. No offense to Apocalypse, but it appears that his or her posts reflect the mainstream science that is taught in public schools.

1 Like
Today, exactly 24 years from the date of my first appearance on this forum. 2000.11.01
13

Ignore the speed of light theories. Use quantum entanglement.

2 Likes
14

I Concur!
I am sooo glad, I thought of this… first! :zany_face:
How does gravity work on the micro~scale!

15

Everything appears to be spent, it is all infinite. It just apppears to dissipate, it is the how we find, that… it becomes something else.

16

In order to derive a correct theory of time travel, one must try to understand time from all possible perspectives. Blaming science does not find a solution to our mathematical problem…

17

Time travel via entanglement entails that a macroscopic system must somehow become quantum coherent and then re-materialize in the spacetime coordinates of the historical past. This could hypothetically work if the materialization was in an alternate branch of the multiverse…

To exploit entanglement at the branch-selection level, the object would need to maintain quantum coherence across its entire state — every particle, every degree of freedom — long enough to execute a branch transition. Decoherence timescales for macroscopic objects are extraordinarily short, on the order of 10⁻²³ seconds or less for anything approaching biological or mechanical complexity. The environment continuously collapses the superposition before any navigable branch structure can be accessed. This isn’t an engineering challenge — it’s a fundamental decoherence problem with no known solution at macroscopic scales.

time-and-displacement-fields
time-and-displacement-fields512×529 37.4 KB

Imagine spacetime as a fabric that can be twisted by extremely dense, rapidly spinning objects — the two microsingularities in the device act like a pair of cosmic drill bits, spinning so fast that they drag the fabric of space and time around them in a vortex. Where the two vortices overlap in the middle of the device, the normal rules of cause-and-effect become unstable — the region between the singularities is no longer firmly anchored to any single timeline, because the gravitational twisting has loosened the lock that pins a given moment to a given branch of reality. The nested shells around the device — the three event horizons — mark the boundaries where this effect is strong, marginal, and negligible, like the eye of a hurricane transitioning to its outer bands. A vehicle sitting in the right zone between these horizons would be sitting in a region where the branch identity of spacetime is ambiguous, and by tuning the relative spin rates and mass offset of the two singularities, you could in principle bias which branch the vehicle “lands” in when the field is switched off — not by moving backward through your own timeline, but by sliding sideways into a parallel branch whose present state resembles a different historical era, the way a needle can be lifted off one groove of a vinyl record and set down in an earlier one.

1 Like
18

I can’t help but wonder why the twelve years mention is important, why that type of “time” limit, why is it only then… it becomes possible to transition back to the alternate branch more likely. Time travel is such a difficult & weird topic. I get why it is soo hard to nail down it.

“pulls out a hammer & a nail” But… maybe this will help! lets try a couple tiny holes punctures!, & @ just the right distances! :zany_face:

1 Like
19

Chiral Flip Hypothesis

If our perception of asymmetric time is a mirror flip whereby the slightly imperfect mirror is spinning at every point in spacetime as a spinning Planck scale unit, then traveling backwards towards the past history would be very difficult. as a crude analogy go back on step move forward two steps – repeat, which would just be a form of time dilation but not actual backwards time travel.

The escape velocity from beyond the event horizon of a black hole is greater than the speed of light. I am thinking that at the center of a black hole there is not a singularity but a reversal of the mirror flip asymmetry where time would flow backwards.

Consequences

  1. No singularity — infinite density would require infinite flip density, forbidden by Axiom 1 (one flip per Planck 4‑volume). Instead, the interior reaches a maximum curvature where q(x) crosses zero and becomes negative.

  2. Time reversal region — Proper time inside still increases locally (the ratchet clicks, but backwards relative to external time). An observer falling in would experience time flowing toward the external past once they cross the inner horizon where q=0. They would not hit a singularity; they’d enter a region where the arrow is reversed.

  3. White hole connection — The time‑reversed interior of a black hole is a white hole interior in the external frame. But since time is reversed locally, an object inside would see the external universe as its future — meaning the white hole “emits” things from its past. This suggests black holes and white holes are the same object viewed from opposite sides of the q=0 surface.

  4. Evaporation endpoint — Hawking radiation carries away energy, reducing the black hole mass. As the mass shrinks, the interior region where q<0 shrinks. When the mass drops below a critical value (near Planck mass), the condition q<0 cannot be sustained — the black hole “bounces” and becomes a regular object with q>0 again. This replaces the singularity with a bounce, potentially resolving the information paradox.

1 Like
20

CFH Prediction: At the center of a black hole, there is no singularity. Instead, the local chirality excess q(x) crosses zero and becomes negative when the curvature R exceeds a critical threshold R_crit ~ (1/l_P²)·(Q/N_total)^α. This reverses the ratchet direction, making time flow backward relative to the external universe. The event horizon becomes a passage to a time-reversed interior. Black hole evaporation terminates in a bounce at Planck scale, not a singularity.

This implies: the interior of astrophysical black holes is not a singularity but a time‑reversed region with negative local chirality excess. The event horizon is not a death sentence; it’s a passage to a region where the arrow of time flips.

1 Like