Continuing the discussion from Members asked whether they have altered their own past:
Comtek~M"216"MHz band? 
quite better version, a great signal~lock “if dealing unusual or heavy statics” even with C204 when dealing with extreme signal hums. “from possible time distortions”
Not an expert at this kind of struff, but I did notice it came out shortly after John “supposedly” left, but… if you knew the right person it is possible to get versions not publicly available yet!
quite the doozy thought experiment also. A 
4 U! ~QS
If the multiverse is correct you would have to do things selflessly, in a sense… even if you do it for yourself, you are not the version that would reap the full benefits of changing said past.
you would be more changing for another version of yourself instead.
Hence being someone, whom is more selfless… is proly for the best.
If time rewinds then our memories of the future are erased.
We would not know the difference…
Say if the universe is akin to a living system and time is analogous to the universe breathing… with exhales(T_fwd) more dominant than inhales(T_rev). The periodicities are like temporary resets and the “big bang” was an initial exhale after a tremendous reset.
This breathing occurs on a macro and micro level…
Physicists have long described time as an arrow — pointing one direction, from past to future, driven by the steady increase of disorder in the universe. But what if that arrow isn’t rigid, and time behaves more like breathing? In this picture, the universe alternates between two phases: an “exhale,” where things unfold forward and possibilities collapse into definite events — the world you experience, moment to moment — and a much subtler “inhale,” where possibilities briefly expand again before the next exhale explores them. The exhale dominates overwhelmingly, which is why time feels one-directional to us. But the small, constant inhale is what keeps the system from ever fully locking into a single, static outcome.
This breathing happens at two very different scales at once, and the relationship between them is the interesting part. At the smallest scale, it’s happening everywhere, constantly — every time a particle interacts, every time some piece of reality “decides” an outcome, that’s a tiny exhale following a tiny inhale. Most of these stay local: an atom decays, a measurement is made, nothing beyond that event notices. But occasionally — vanishingly rarely — enormous numbers of these small events line up in phase with each other, the way individual magnetic atoms in a piece of iron can suddenly all point the same direction at once instead of canceling out randomly. When that synchronization happens at the largest possible scale, you get a macro-breath: a reset of the universe’s entire temporal structure, with the Big Bang understood as the first great exhale following such a synchronization.
What makes this a genuinely testable idea, rather than just a poetic reframing of existing physics, is that it doesn’t require destroying information to reset the universe — it only requires reshuffling how that information gets read out. The underlying substrate could, in principle, retain a full record of what came before, even while the observable sequence of events starts over from scratch — much like reformatting a hard drive doesn’t necessarily erase the data, just the map used to find it. That means any “memory” of a prior universe wouldn’t show up as some leftover signal breaking through from before the reset — it would be structurally inaccessible from inside the new one, by the same logic that makes any built-in correlations in the framework non-signaling. The open scientific work is finding what, if anything, could still leave a trace: a subtle asymmetry, a statistical fingerprint, something that survives even though direct access to the “before” is closed off in principle.
I certainly believe consciousness transcends the physical, I also believe that it can be dampered by the physical & outside means, but as soon as it is freed from those constraints it enlarges/expeands exponentially.
~QS
We could say that the physical is an aspect or subset of the metaphysical – which has more general laws that the physical basics we currently perceive with the physical senses.
In this view, physical reality operates like a specialized “sub-routine” or dense projection governed by local rules (like spacetime, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism), while the broader metaphysical domain houses the overarching principles, laws of logic, consciousness, or informational frameworks that allow a physical reality to exist in the first place.
This fledgling theory reframes our understanding of existence by suggesting that reality operates on two distinct informational tiers: an infinite, continuous “analog” foundation and a discrete, “digital” surface. At the base layer lies a smooth, undivided realm of pure potential—a vast reservoir containing all possible states, fields, and relationships simultaneously. Because this underlying ground lacks rigid boundaries or fixed divisions, it resembles an all-encompassing, holistic continuum. In philosophical and metaphysical terms, this infinite baseline can be understood as proto-consciousness, or the ultimate ground of being from which every specific feature of the cosmos originally emerges.
The physical world we experience every day represents the digital localized rendering of that deeper analog layer. Human sensory systems and conscious minds act essentially as high-level processors, sampling the infinite continuous background and converting it into clear, manageable units of perception. Just as a computer monitor translates complex digital code into distinct pixels and icons, conscious awareness transforms an overwhelming quantum-like continuum into recognizable shapes, distinct colors, tangible objects, and individual moments in time. What we perceive as solid physical reality is not the entirety of existence, but a streamlined, readable interface designed to help us navigate it.
By classifying conscious perception as a digital manifestation of an analog universe, this perspective bridges ancient metaphysics with modern information theory. Creation, under this model, is not the act of building something out of nothing, but rather a process of filtering and focusing undivided infinite potential into structured, localized experiences. Individual consciousnesses serve as localized lenses—discrete windows through which the vast, continuous whole observes and knows itself in finite detail. In doing so, the theory offers a compelling synthesis of science and philosophy, suggesting that mind and matter are simply different expressions of a single, deeply interconnected reality.
