Ray (Rainmantime),
I think I have a formula for my GOD IS LIGHT theory…
I always think of the infinity symbol as a symbol for GOD
infinity = e * t * k
Where e = energy
Where t = time
Where k = knowledge
You could shorten it just for infinity
infinity = e * t
What do you think Rainman?
TheCigMan
Copyright (c) 2006 John J. McMonagle All Rights Reserved.
Edited by TheCigSmokinMan3 (08/28/06 03:55 PM)
Hi John (CigMan):
I think the old adage “all things come in threes” applies everywhere (and everywhen). So I’m partial to your first version! But I would also like to “see your work” for how you derived the equation, the dimensional analysis of the terms, and how it fits in with current physics and extends it. 
For any equation is only as good as it can predict physical observations in our realm.
RMT
RainManTime
“For any equation is only as good as it can predict physical observations in our realm.”
Rain, I don’t think most people see ‘our realm’ And according to string theory there are 11 dimensions. But 11 to the power of 10 dimensions is the real number because every plane of 11 dimensions has an additional 10 dimensions associated with it… But I have to think about this one some more… Maybe something like your ‘pyramid’ work of PackerBacker and yourself.
"But I would also like to “see your work” for how you derived the equation, the dimensional analysis of the terms, and how it fits in with current physics and extends it. "
The formula just came to me… I was wondering how would one describe ‘infinity’ or in other words ‘all light matter and energy in the universe’ or ‘GOD’ from my perspective…
Infinity may also be described as:
infinity = e * t * d
Where e - energy
Where t = time
Where d = distance
all equally infinite
Copyright (c) 2006 John J. McMonagle All Rights Reserved.
Edited by TheCigSmokinMan3 (09/14/06 01:57 PM)
Hi Cig,
Let me start out with a caveat: If you are not interested in talking science and following scientific methods (like that idiot Peepo), then let me know now and I will not engage you. However, like I said earlier, I like where you are going with this but you can’t simply leave the precepts of science behind if you wish to achieve viable “answers”. So my point here is in helping you understand my earlier comment.
OK, now let me show you what I mean by “dimensional analysis”, because it is one of the most useful tools that scientists and engineers use in our work to make sense out of things. Time (t) and distance (d) are already fundamental dimensional units, so they can remain as-is. However, we need to decompose energy into its fundamental units, as follows:
Energy = Force (F) * distance (d)
Force = Mass (m) * distance (d) / time^2 (t)^2
So if we plug the dimensions of Force into Energy, and then plug all that into your equation for infinity and simplify we get the following dimensions for infinity:
infinity = (m)*(d)^3/(t)
Would these units make sense to you? AFAIAC, I would wonder why “infinity” would ever be subject to time at all, being that time is really derived from the motion of matter.
RMT
Rainman,
True. I didn’t go to ‘engineering’ school. But I did go to the ‘science fair’ every year
But the category here is Other Weird Stuff->New Science and Alternate Energies
That is why I question Americans reading comprehension… I think all the aluminum in deodorant and mercury in dental fillings has ‘retarded’ people.
But I was looking for a formula to explain that the GOD IS LIGHT or GOD is the UNIVERSE theory as according to STRING THEORY.
So if infinity represents the universe and the universe may be GOD as ENERGY? How would one describe it?
True. I am new to theoretical physics… But I think I’m on the right track…
As for your inference, does infinity relate to time or time travel? Like a map from point A to point B one must know where they are to know where they are going
String Theory suggests not only 11 dimensions with multiple planes or sheets if you will. What is containing those planes with 11 dimensions? THE UNIVERSE or INFINITY? Maybe another abstract theory
You got to know where you ‘are’ before you know where you are going to…
This might be an exaggeration but I don’t think anyone really cared about E(energy) until Einstein and his wife came up with E=MC2 But there was of course the race to create the atomic bomb..
As for “infinity = (m)*(d)^3/(t)”, I would disagree. If you think of infinity in terms of distance, does distance have mass? If you think of infinity in terms of the universe, does M(mass) account for the vacuum of space or dark energy? I don’t think so…
You didn’t think I was serious when I put Where k=knowledge. lol
It was more of abstract expression Ray… I love this!!!
I am but your humble apprentice here RainmanTime…
TheCigMan
Edited by TheCigSmokinMan3 (09/14/06 03:05 PM)
Hi Cig,
Understood, but any formula you consider must still pass muster with regard to SOME system of units of measure…either our existing scientific procedures should apply, or your formula should be able to predict things where current physics cannot.
You mention string theory. I would encourage you (as I encourage all) to investigate how the Qabalists (those who study the geometric network model known as the Tree Of Life) have been saying there are 11 dimensions since ancient times. And if you check out the following website, you will note that the animated graphic on the right, which is used in discussing the dimensions of string theory, is pretty close to the Tree Of Life (and not by accident, I would hazard to guess):
http://www.tenthdimension.com/flash2.php
I agree with the first part, but it is my belief (and I believe my math supports) that God is well above the concept of Energy. In fact, Energy is simply a metric we use to measure physicality, and the “magic” that is accomplished through the implementation of any closed-loop control system shows that Information is a metric at a fractally higher dimension than Energy, because Information is the metric used to close a control loop, and any control loop controls Energy.
The Tree Of Life is a “map of maps” that not only describes the architecture of the human body, but also the architecture of DNA.
Qabalah explains that our universe is comprised of 10 emanations (dimensions) and the 11th dimension exists “beyond” and that dimension is God.
Yes, it is an exaggeration. Various forms of the Energy Equation have been defined since Newton’s time. Bernoulli’s principle is nothing but the standard Energy Equation of mechanics written for fluid flow instead of solid masses. So plenty of people knew about Energy before Einstein. Einstein’s unique contribution was in showing that Mass was nothing more than bound Energy.
Well, if you disagree then I am afraid you will have to re-think your equation… in fact, that was my purpose in showing you the dimensional analysis of your equation. I am trying to show you how dimensional analysis helps us in thinking about these things. But in reality “infinity” is not a number. It is a concept and will forever be a concept that cannot be quantified.
That is exactly the point: When you wish to consider infinity, you must ask “infinite what?”. If you are speaking of infinite space, then since we know space is 3-dimensional we would still describe infinite space as a manifold of (d)^3.
You would have to be a bit more clear here, Cig. The way that I, and most people of science, think of “the universe” it is the sum total of all mass, space, and time. That’s why I have mentioned plenty times here on the forums that my Massive SpaceTime theory is well-founded in the basics of science.
Yes, I knew you were not serious about that… mostly because if I would have pressed you, I would have asked you “how would you define knowledge in terms of the fundamental dimensions of mass, space, and time?”
RMT
infinity = t
infinity = k
infinity = d
infinity = e
No [censored] infinity = tke.
CigDig,
Velocity shines bright, do you pander this dander? Tracking is on, but slimmer is but a glimmer. And or for nor, but I applaud you though.
C-squared is the new b-squared. Lot and lots to push forward.
You’re welcome and thanks!
RMT