UFO ships, where are they from?
2 Likes
I thought all the files were released!!!
I am glad you are still keeping an eye on this subject from the government, Apocalypse! 
~QS
Do you know if they will still be realeasing more?
Dang the link you posted will not load for me. “kicks dirt!” have to try again later maybe! This is all it does/says instead?
This page couldn’t load
Reload to try again, or go back.
Reload
Back
~QS
1 Like
The panel expresses strong skepticism regarding the recent media sensation surrounding UFOs (now termed UAPs), arguing that the narrative is driven more by sensationalism than solid scientific evidence. The speakers point out that public excitement often leads to misinterpretations; for instance, when the Pentagon authenticates videos as “real,” it simply confirms that the footage is authentic rather than fake or CGI, not that it depicts extraterrestrial craft. Historical parallels—such as the government’s delayed, mundane explanations following the 1990s Roswell hype—demonstrate a recurring pattern: media outlets and self-interested authors hype reports, yet believers remain unsatisfied by rational explanations, continuing to suspect hidden truths.
A central issue raised is the total absence of high-resolution data accessible to the broader scientific community, leaving researchers unable to verify claims made by pilots or government officials. The speakers criticize the media for promoting unfalsifiable framing—where an inability to disprove something is treated as potential evidence—and for deferring excessively to military witnesses while dismissing scientific analysis. While low-quality, ambiguous videos continue to capture public interest, the participants conclude that the underlying narrative fails to hold up to rigorous scientific standards, leaving top researchers without the transparent, high-fidelity data needed to draw meaningful conclusions.