201

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Titorian,

On your past posting you indicated that the economy over a period of
time will be improving but you gave us a hint that the stock market
will not follow suite. So the question is will it fall in the future or not
and what will the date when it will begin. After it begins will there be
recover or not or will it chronically go down after that date thus a
perpetual falling stock market.

Thx,

202

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

How old are you (24 or 62)? Why do you say ‘thousand of miles from here’ when you should say decades from my own time? Shouldn’t you be saying ’ I remember when I was at this time opposing the middle-east war…', but you don’t do that. You don’t talk from your ‘golden-age’ memories.<<

You have to understand my position. That other me 1,000 miles away from here is really me- if anyone is a double of the other person it’s me, if anyone dosen’t belong here it’s me. The other me is really me back in 2007. My personal timeline goes from 1982 to 2044 to 2006 in a straight line… the only thing that can change that is me. I don’t have the proper words to describe it and it’s kinda scary if you think about it… it’s like watching a live play- the play will play out only if you don’t interfere with its performance. See below.

The question is, what does your history book say about 2004 US presidential election, can you give us a quote?<<

Nothing out of the ordinary, actually. You folks do realize LBJ also stole an election and so did Nixon and Roosevelt and even Lincoln for that matter. Bush is not the monster you all think he is today- don’t forget 90% of you approved of this war when it began.

Iran has outlawed the American dollar and will put anyone in jail that uses it in their country after that date. They have the ominous notoriety of being the first nation in the world to do such a thing. The real issue in Iran is NOT nuclear, but rather the decision to not use the American dollar for trade and the sale of oil. On the heels of Iran’s decision, North Korea has followed suit and also outlawed the use of the American dollar in their country. Finally, Malaysia the next day did the same thing.<<

Green dollars have no value in a black market economy- what good are green dollars to Iran? To buy oil. This issue is much larger than countries not taking our currency. Saddam used to light his cigars with American $100 bills- I’m sure with Iran after a dozen warehouses full of American dollars they are starting to realize the same thing. That’s why these are called the black wars.

you dont mention global warming, iraq, midddle east, israel, pollution, rising sea levels<<

I already did in great detail in previous posts.
-Global Warming: We’re trying to reverse it, lots of projects.
-Iraq: They’re still on the map. Many of them emigrated here in the 10’s-20’s.
-Middle East:It’s still on the map.
-Isreal: It’s still on the map.
-Pollution: Air pollution, see global warming. Trash pollution- we don’t generate as much solid trash as you think.
-Rising Sea Levels: We’re terraforming the Earth.

dont suppose you could at least mention complete disasters in the political ring, no point in throwing a vote away …or is there!!<<

To what end? The closest I’ll come to that is to say I never heard of Obama just as you never heard of whoever ran against Millard Fillmore.

does the world blow up on a working day<<

Do you mean “blow up” or “melt down”?

On your past posting you indicated that the economy over a period of time will be improving but you gave us a hint that the stock market will not follow suite. So the question is will it fall in the future or not and what will the date when it will begin. After it begins will there be
recover or not or will it chronically go down after that date thus a perpetual falling stock market.<<

There are two ways to look at the economy-
-Our economy, as in, “do we all have food on the table”
-Our economy as compared to the rest of the world

We are in the second phase of a global meltdown… I’m actually amazed I have to point this stuff out- look around you! Read up on 1933 to see how it turns out. As far as things at home, we all need to tighten our belts- we all don’t order takeout 4 times a week, we all don’t eat chemicalburgers.

The Time Travel Portal has been taken down. This is a problem for me because I am supposed to start posting there sometime in 2011 (and with my current actions, find this old thread). It’s being taken down indicates either I did something to make it come down, or another time traveler did. The history I come from, TTP is up until around 2011. Can anyone shed some light on this?

I won’t/can’t stay online much longer, I am afraid causality may be catching up to me. I would like to start posting over at Kaku’s forum, and I generally only post in one place at a time. Being a time traveler posting on a time traveling site I think is pushing my luck. Other weird stuff is happening too. I am in the midst of moving to another location, I’ll post as soon as I am resettled.
http://www.mkaku.org/forums/

I guess this topic is limited to 11 pages after all-

203

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Titorian, you already did post on the TimeTravelPortal and then migrated over here. I still haven’t come away with learning anything from your posts. Oh well. That is, anything we don’t already know. I have to say it. What good is it anyway?

204

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Titorian,

The other form that you wish to post on is gone but you
claimed it would survive well into you old future. You
claimed that there was only one time line in essence
But you just showed that you are on a parallel time line
and are no longer on you old time line. You just proved
the mult-universe theorem is true and you thermodynamic principle
is wrong for creating new time line. New timeline are created
all the time because you are on a new time line since all
the events are different this time around in this past. This
then lead then are all you prediction going to be wrong since
we are not on your old time line and now you are on our
time line.

Thx,

205

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Cat,

Please let him go to Dr. Kaku’s site…oh, please. )

I’m sure that Dr. Kaku will be thrilled to no end to discover that at some time in the future he forgets how to do high school algebra and totally forgets the basic concepts of special relativity.

206

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Ha, ha, ha. )

207

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

For days I had a feeling that you were going to do the same -damn- thing that the other TTs did and disappear.

I am going to be frank … You are not going to be back. If you really are an time traveller, then you are an criminal who is pursuing the one thing … and that is money. If you are not, then you are still an criminal - just name of the game is propaganda.

208

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Having read this entire thread, I find it pretty incredulous. Persistence always earns an aspiring TT a few marks, but this doesn’t add up. I’m no expert, but the science seems silly–decoporiliaztion when he meets his double? Huh? Pamela rightly points out that the atoms would not be actual duplicates…
Titors science was compelling, even orignal, and he seemed to embody an ethos someone from the future might actually have. This guy is, well, selfish beyond measure as he attributes “not warning” us (as prior TT’s have done,) to noble motives, as if hanging out together on this board is some big expression of backbone and courage. huh? Coming back to make money? Wow, that’s not the kind of moral development I would aspire to in our collective future.
Curious what your conclusions are Pamela, you seem to have a pretty sane head on your shoulders.
Also wonder why anyone would go to such lengths, doesn’t make sense for any reason I can imagine. Seems pretty clear, unless I’m missing the punch line here that this is a joke.

209

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Hang in there Titorian.
At least the world you describe is better than the one I have seen.

Quick question, did you see anything like this?
Futuristic deluxe flying cruise ship.
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/whatsnew/18ac893302839010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html

210

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

.-..-
By the wayside, decoporiliaztion never bothered Erwin
Superpositions ms
Decoherence from the Rapid City

211

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Titorian already post here as his younger self
his younger self does not know

212

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/07/AR2007030702557.html

Indians 1000000 acres?

213

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

yeah i think its funny how many people never scroll down to the bottom of the page

214

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Its always been there lol
Why you think they dont just own up
all the info you need is on the site
You Yanks have always been Gullible sheep..
bit of a generalisation..
But they have run rings around you for years..

215

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Hi Folks!

My name is Ralph. I am a time traveller from 2045. I arrived a couple of months ago, I was one of the other time travellers Titorian mentioned before. Titorian is no longer in this timeline, he made his last post last night.

I was sent back by The Branson Foundation to collect all relevant materials pertaining to Titorian. I already have the original TTP posts, if anyone here has had email or PM communications with Titorian and would like them added to the archive, I would love to add it to the archive.

Thank you

216

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

45,

You mean that he made his last post here last night. He’s now posting on Kaku’s TT forum.

What do the bangers call it? “Vario jumper”? Yeah, I’m sure that’s the proper name. )

217

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

This equation makes no sense from Titorian?

(1) C = M*(E)^2 Titorian
(2) E = MC^2 and from the great man.

So let eliminate the constants C the speed of light.

(1) → (2) Substituting C

(3) E = M (M*(E)^2)^2

(4) E = M*((M)^2*(E)^4)

(5) E = M^3*E^4

(6) 1/E^3 = M^3

(7) 1/E = M

So what this mean as energy grow mass decreases. So it does not make any sense what so ever to me unless I screwed the grade 10 physics class?

Does anyone have any insights into this?

Thx.

218

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

There is only one reality is not true! (Titorian Quote)

If there was only one time line then there would be no free will what so ever.
If there was only one reality then you should not fit into our timeline and change
history thus creating a sub time line. The way it works there is multiple time line
with only one time line that is active with energy that is driving it.
With Titorian theory there would be no free will, which is ridiculous.
We open and close door to different possibilities all the time thus different time line.
The real John Titor made prediction of the future that did not occurs thus the
time line changed into a new time line thus multiple time line theory is true or John Titor is a fraud.
There are multiple time lines or else there is no free will.

219

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Now, to finish the bogus math that we started earlier.

(7) 1/E = M
(2) E = MC^2
(8) Sub (7) into (2) 1/M = MC^2
(9) 1 = M^2*C^2
(10) C = 1/M
(11) C = 3.0 x10^8
(12) Thus M = 3.3ng

Problem unit don’t match.

We also find that

(7) 1/E = M
(10) C= 1/M
(13) Thus eliminate M between (7) and (10) we get E = C thus E = 3.0x10^8

Problem unit don’t match again.

The really neat thing from this entire stupid math is that for

(1) C = M*(E)^2 Titorian
(2) E = MC^2 and from the great man.

Both equations (1) and (2) are equivalent to each when C = E.
This gives credibility to Titorian equation to some extent.

220

Re: Yet another time traveling claim

Further

Quoted from:
http://community-2.webtv.net/SkyVessel/Control/

"Newton provided the necessary formal expression in the calculus, where he defined velocity as the rate of change of position with respect to time, and acceleration as the rate of change of velocity with respect to time.

Velocity is known as the first derivative (of position), acceleration as the second derivative. These two expressions laid the basis for the theory of gravitation.

While Newton mentioned a third derivative, he made no attempt to give it a physical meaning. What is it? Since each derivative is the rate of change of the quantity derived (i.e., velocity is the rate of change of position, acceleration the rate of change of velocity), we may conclude that the third derivative is the rate of change of acceleration.

Every automobile driver has direct experience with the third derivative, for in controlling the car by pushing the accelerator, applying the brake, or changing its direction with the steering wheel, he is changing its acceleration.

http://community-2.webtv.net/SkyVessel/Control/scrapbookFiles/importD0.gif

Maxwell and Einstein USED ONLY VELOCITY & ACCELERATION, in formulating current electromagnetic theory and relativity theory, NEVER considering Control, or the third derivative of position L, expressed mathematically as L/T³.

Here is a direct quote from Albert Einstein that proves this point:
" THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY OWES ITS ORIGINS TO MAXWELL’S EQUATIONS OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD "
ALBERT EINSTEIN
(ed. Schilpp; Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Library of living Authors, 1949, p62.) "
end quoted

More:
http://community-2.webtv.net/hotmail.com/prime137/doc0/

So the Physics of 2007 don´t use the L/T³, because
1- only Position (statics) and it’s first two derivatives, Velocity, and Acceleration are used in current science.
2-the gov don´t want ordinary Joe to Built Time Machines…LOL but until 2009 or less…thanks to Titorian, and the changes he made…

3- if you need to move from present to future or past, you need to start learning math again…

And there are more alternate timelines, but are overlapping this one…until 2012…

–
Regards

5,6. The Moral Law causes the people to be in complete
accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him
regardless of their lives, undismayed by any danger.
SUN TZU ON THE ART OF WAR