Chronohistorian

[cpguy]

Did you read my post (or Darby's original post) at all? There's a maximum number of posts to a thread. I'm trying to find out what that number is, meanwhile I suggest we use a new thread to continue this conversation... I don't see the problem with that?!

Roel

I hope this helps Roel.

Chrono- If you would please start to continue the comversation on this thread.

Everyone else-please advert (turn your attention) here rather than the other thread.

Thank you.

Guy D.

P.S. To Chrono: Are you allowed to see the world yet? Or just the T.V. tube? Or whatever is near where you are outside?

 

[chronohistorian]

Here is the original thread:



http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=18972&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

here is the original message:



I have come from the future to learn about your time and when exactly things happened because the history from 1970-2150 is partially lost when I come from.

I have been here since November 11th 2003.

In my time my profession is a chronohistorian which means I am a historian that investigates the happenings of the past by visiting and experiencing the time.

If you have any questions please ask me them however if they are about the future I may not answer them because the questions may be classified in time.

If I have any questions though I would like you to answer them.


You should only get one chance at your time and no chance at someone elses time.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


here are my answers to the last questions:






I have been going out and watching people.



sosuemetoo-there are no future writing but the transam were well known to love playing jokes on people.


It is like coins now but it has security chips inside to stop forgeries unfortunately criminals just get more clever. We also have paper money too


keeb333-I thought you would know what I would say but ok I will make it longer:


If you are in the army, the trainers sometimes do surprise tests in the life simulator. You go to sleep and the trainers beam you into a life simulator and when you wake you are faced with a scenario.

is that better?

 

[Transient001]

Friends

Please note the way that by mistake CPGUY had addressed Chronohistorian on the last post on this thread.

Until later becomes now.

 

[keeb333]

If you are in the army, the trainers sometimes do surprise tests in the life simulator. You go to sleep and the trainers beam you into a life simulator and when you wake you are faced with a scenario.

Hmmm.....curious....

How do you spell the 3rd person plural posessive pronoun in the English language?

 

[creedo299]

Note, because of irregularities in the probable motis of said Chronohistorian, poster Creedo 299 is leaving discussion in this thread and may only observe?

The irregularity will be disclosed upon a personal message on this board, but will not be disclosed otherwise.

Thank you

 

[chronohistorian]

trollface-Have you also spent about 12 hours a day doing battle simulations and preparing for a fight and after that doing reports and answering emails and messages here?



According to our history books they printed excess money to pay the reparations.


Th satellites used brain medical scanning equipment to examine the brain.


I have heard many teachers and historians tell people about the man with the money.


You know nothing of our time. so even in 1000s of years people won't be able to use kinetic energy to do things? if you say yes then you are the stupid one.



I can't explain the receeding at all. It has stumped me.


It hasn't changed. It is just easier saying go 30LYPH than saying go 300000LYPH.



The sea level is flat. I know you know nothing now because I asked someone about the lunarium and according to him it would decay but it would slowly decay on earth but it doesn't in space.



The Time guard said there was a bit of left over extra water and they sent it to lizara after they had a major drought. But according to them it wasn't a lot of extra water.



I am documenting my findings. I am mostly typing.


It hasn't changed but the people in my time would know what I was talking about.


Yes the engines turn it.



The seat is integrated into the ships systems which makes the kinetic energy work.


Cryonics is freezing an already dead person so we can cure the disease in the future. In cryogenics they are not dead.


I don't think lunarium is radioactive so I don't think it has a half life.


The reefs disappeared naturally.


I have no idea which modern school of Communism the philsophy came out of.


Greenhouse gases have partly to do with it to:

The sunlight radiation comes down and is partly reflected back because of the atmosphere but the greenhouse gases are above the atmosphere so they reflect the sunlight back which heats up the earth more.
I think this is it anyway. I learned this over 12 years ago.
I think this refers to the the First Law Of Thermodynamics too.



Global warming is part of ice age. Every 12000 years or so the earth goes into an ice age. If you speed it up with the burning of fossil fuels (global warming) then the ice age will come quicker.
Learned this 12 years ago too.


E=mc^2 is not wrong but the rest of the theory is.


Do you think somewhere in space weird things could happen?
How do you know we aren't the weird planet?


What you know of the moon isn't mysterious.


You know absolutely nothing. I realise now that you are stupid. of cause equipment can prove different things. I think you should go back to school.

 

[creedo299]

Chronohistorian said;I can't explain the receeding at all. It has stumped me.

Creedo responds;They can't figure it out, even in your time.......?

 

[Siegmund]

Siegmund asks why creedo is speaking in the third person...

 

[trollface]

Have you also spent about 12 hours a day doing battle simulations and preparing for a fight and after that doing reports and answering emails and messages here?

Yes, I have done exactly that. Are you trying to say that watching TV and stalking people is that strenuous?

According to our history books they printed excess money to pay the reparations.

so can you tell me when it was discovered that the history of this time was wrong, and who discovered it, and how come those Germans living now don't disagree with that version of events? Bear in mind, before you answer, I spend part of my childhood, and recieved some of my schooling in Germany.

Th satellites used brain medical scanning equipment to examine the brain.

So you are saying that they use radiomagnetic devices?

I have heard many teachers and historians tell people about the man with the money.

And yet you still didn't understand the significance of it? Are you saying here that even among your peers and those who technically should be beneath your profession because they teach highschool you aren't a compentent scholar?

You know nothing of our time. so even in 1000s of years people won't be able to use kinetic energy to do things?

People use kinetic energy to do things now. It's just not possible to do the things you are claiming.

I can't explain the receeding at all. It has stumped me.

Now there's a surprise.

It hasn't changed. It is just easier saying go 30LYPH than saying go 300000LYPH.

You said that the word "lightspeed" in your time now meant something other than the speed of light, AKA "c", which is 299,792,458 meters per second or approximately 3*10^8. You said that the word "lightspeed" in your time meant 10,000 times the speed of light, or 2,997,924,580,000 meters per second or approximately 3*10^12. That means that the definition of "lightspeed" has changed. Otherwise it'd be the same, and not different.

So, what's the speed of light now called?

The sea level is flat.

The sea level is flat, but the water level has receeded different amounts for different countrys? And France and England aren't joined, even though they would be if what you'd said were true?

I know you know nothing now because I asked someone about the lunarium and according to him it would decay but it would slowly decay on earth but it doesn't in space.

Why wouldn't it decay in space? What's different about space? Why weren't these magical properties of the moon noticed?

The Time guard said there was a bit of left over extra water and they sent it to lizara after they had a major drought. But according to them it wasn't a lot of extra water.

So what did they do to the extra water before they sent it off?

And, didn't you say that dehydration was a problem of your planet? So, why would they want to reduce the amount of water on Earth?

I am documenting my findings. I am mostly typing.

So why not use the video? That's an exact form of documentation that you can cite and that others can check.

It hasn't changed but the people in my time would know what I was talking about.

If the language hasn't changed, then why would people in your time be more able to determine what you are saying than us? After all, the language hasn't changed.

Yes the engines turn it.

How? Engines on the side in the way you describe could only push it sideways, not turn it. You'd nead at least 2 engines per side to turn.

The seat is integrated into the ships systems which makes the kinetic energy work.

"Makes the kinetic energy work"? The desired result is kinetic energy. So, what, it changes the kinetic energy into kinetic energy? How does it do that?

Cryonics is freezing an already dead person so we can cure the disease in the future. In cryogenics they are not dead.

Oh, I see, this is another word that has a differnet meaning in the future, but is also exactly the same because the language hasn't changed, right?

So...what has freezing live bodies got to do with increasing the half-life of an element?

I don't think lunarium is radioactive so I don't think it has a half life.

Um, it'd be a very, very unusual element if it wasn't radioactive. In fact, it'd be the only thing in the entire universe which wasn't radioactive. Everything is radioactive. Or is this more magic of the mysterious space?

And, if you now don't believe that Lunarium has a half-life, then why did you give me all that guff about extending the half-life with a box and a red light? Were you telling me porkies?

The reefs disappeared naturally.

You said that the reef's natural environment was destroyed by terraforming. How is that naturally?

Greenhouse gases have partly to do with it to:

I know what Greenhouse gases are, you don't have to patorinise me (although, on that score, I suppose I should say that it's good that you seem to have learned to use a search engine). But your logic has gone full-circle here. You initially said that the ice caps were enlargened to drop the sea level globally and therefore to reduce greenhouse gases. You're now saying that teh ice caps can be larger because there are no greenhouse gases. Which is it? Are the ice caps bigger because of the greenhouse gases, or are the gases gone because of the ice caps?

Global warming is part of ice age. Every 12000 years or so the earth goes into an ice age. If you speed it up with the burning of fossil fuels (global warming) then the ice age will come quicker.

I ask again how global warming is supposed to make an ice age.

E=mc^2 is not wrong but the rest of the theory is.

You said that it was wrong. If you're going to say these things, you should at least be consistant about it.

Do you think somewhere in space weird things could happen?

It depends on how you define "weird". If by "weird" you mean "impossible, ridiculous and stupid", then no.

What you know of the moon isn't mysterious.

Now that is correct.

You know absolutely nothing.

And yet I still seem to know more than you do.

I realise now that you are stupid.

For the record, I've never called you stupid. I've said that you're not as informed about the subjects you're discussing as you should be to approach being a convincing hoaxer, and I've called your ideas stupid, and I've said that you are in no way a professional academic as you can't express yourself clearly and are terrible at spelling and grammar, and thst you're certainly not a time traveller, but I've not called you stupid.

I'll expect your apology in your next reply.

of cause equipment can prove different things. I think you should go back to school.

Different equipment may be able to prove differnt things in some cases. But in other cases it can't. In the case of relativity, it can't. That's like saying that gravity works differently in the future or that whether something is in a vaccuum or not affects it's half-life. Which, to be fair, you did also say.

I'd also like to point out the irony of being told to go back to school by someone who doesn't seem to know how to spell the word "course".

Again, you've missed out a lot, but again I don't really have the time to go through this at the moment. I'll come back to them, don't you worry.

 

[creedo299]

Note how rapidly Chrono is mastering both English and the use of this eras computers, if he is from the future.

Also look for the word whistle, or the British version of while?

I did not see this in any of his post, did anyone else?

It was said concerning the Billy Meier contacts in Switzerland.Know that when Billy had asked Pleiadean Cosmonaut Semjase to sit and draw with colored pencils, that she did so with great difficulty.

She said to Billy, that her rear end was sore, as she was not use to this?

What would five hundred years of evolution do, as an influence on one's evolution, if the nature of society was predominantly computer run?

If this is true, then Chronohistorian, by all measures and guesses, should be almost not only a step up in human evolution, however superhuman.

Remember, he's been here now, for only how long?

I'll kick your as*, might not apply to meeting Chronohistorian, as he might have the strength of two men and well developed ones at that?!

There was a Time & Life book, showing the effect of vitamins on people since the world war 2 era.

People have been steadily growing since the turn of the century and their health has been improving.

What are people like in five hundred years time?

 

[chronohistorian]

creedo299-I aren't bothered about this stuff. I am not a scientist.


trollface-I am not just watching tv.


I cannot tell you who discovered part of the history was missing because I would have to tell you what my mission is.


They used sophisticated equipment to scan the brain.


I know what it signifies, it signifies hyperinflation and with that story it shows how bad it was.


Anything is possible. you just sound like a pesimist.


The speed of light is the same. Lets just say that this time can't understand the future. I would have though even a toddler would understand what I said though.


Diffferent countries are more under the sea level than others so if you actually think about it it would recede different amounts.


Things are different in space. not everything than you know is the same.


We don't know what they did with the extra water.

I never said dehydration was a problem.
Even if it was (which it isn't) why would we drink salty seawater?


There is already video clips in my time.


People in my time are just smarter and more able to grasp things than people from this time.


You have no idea what our ship's engines look like or how powerful they are.
why are you theorising when you should be considering if it is possible.

I don't understand what you are talking about with kinetic energy.


You can freeze a body the same way you freeze an element. The tranformer increases the life span of the element.


Not all elements are radioactive. go back to school and learn something. I have just realised you are the most stupid person here.

where did I say that the reefs were destroyed by terraforming? please tell me because I am wrong.
tell me the page number too.

The greenhouse gases are gone

 

[JamesAnthony]

Hi Chrono,

rather than calling people stupid, I think it might be better to give a quick explanation as to why Lunarium MUST be radioactive...

From this page

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q: How many naturally occuring radioactive elements exist and what are they?

A: Natural radioactivity originates from extraterrestrial sources as well as from radioactive elements in the earth's crust. About 340 nuclides have been found in nature, and more than 60 of these are radioactive. All elements having an atomic number greater than 80 possess radioactive isotopes, and all isotopes of elements heavier than number 83 are radioactive.

The natural radioactivity of the earth includes three major categories. Primordial radionuclides have half-lives sufficiently long that they have survived since their creation. Secondary radionuclides are derived from radioactive decay of the primordials. Cosmogenic radionuclides are continuously produced by bombardment of stable nuclides by cosmic rays, primarily in the atmosphere. Some human-made radionuclides persist in the environment, but these are not "natural." A much larger number of radioactive isotopes than now exist were produced when the matter of which the universe is formed first came into being several billion years ago, but most of them have decayed out of existence. The primordial radionuclides which now exist are those that have half-lives at least comparable to the age of the universe. Radioisotopes with half-lives of less than about 108 years have become undetectable in the 30 or so half-lives since their creation, whereas radionuclides with half-lives greater than 1010 years have decayed very little up to the present time.

More detailed information on natural radionuclides, including lists of individual radionuclides, can be found in the book Environmental Radioactivity, Merril Eisenbud and Tom Gesell, Academic Press, San Diego, 1997, and on the Idaho State University sponsored Web site: Radioactivity in Nature.

Tom Gesell

If that's not enough for you then pay attention to your own words... In the same post might I add!

The sea level is flat. I know you know nothing now because I asked someone about the lunarium and according to him it would decay but it would slowly decay on earth but it doesn't in space.

I don't think lunarium is radioactive so I don't think it has a half life.

Now, I'm sure you'd like us all to believe that radiation and decay are two completely different things, but then you would be full of bs. They are two sides of the same coin. When an element decays into two or more other elements, the total mass of these new elements is less than the mass of the original element. This missing mass is released as energy(radiation) in the form of alpha, beta and gamma radiation depending on where the mass is lost. the energy of this reaction can be obtained using the formula of E=mc^2

Now I feel a premonition coming on... Chronohistorian is going to avoid this flaw in his story by claiming to no be a scientist.

Well, then why go to the bother of explaining that half-lifes can be extended, that lunarium decays more slowly on earth than in space? If lunarium didn't decay, then it would be a revolutionary breakthrough in science and EVERY school kid would know this even in passing.



By the way, you never commented on my decision to turn you over to the authorities if a terrorist attack should occur on Big Ben...

James

 

[timescholar]

Speaking of the authorities, I know people too, who work at the National Security Agency (and I see this person regularly), and people who work for a newspaper. So, this forum, I guess you could say, is far from "low profile"... I could easily say, "Check out this site. It may seem weird, but one person seems to claim knowledge of a terrorist attack on our ally, Britain. Included is the IP address, and a tracert log to the user's IP, as well as their ISP. Pass it along.". The ISP can easily search in their record of who was using the computer at times like 3:00am EDT, and 5:00pm EDT (since that's when I see you online according to your posts).

 

[trollface]

trollface-I am not just watching tv.

I know, you're also stalking people.

I cannot tell you who discovered part of the history was missing because I would have to tell you what my mission is.

What part of what history is missing? Don't tell me you're trying to say that you made a mistake with regards to the Ruhr region because in our time the history it's self is actually wrong. Please don't.

As for what your mission is, you said in the first post.

They used sophisticated equipment to scan the brain.

Well, that's helpfully descriptive. Under what scientific principal(s) does this equipment operate?

I know what it signifies, it signifies hyperinflation and with that story it shows how bad it was.

So why didn't you include anything in the story when you told it that had to do with that? Why did you tell the story and not actually make it anything to do with the point of the story, and then when questioned say that you didn't know because it was just something that your teacher had told you?

Anything is possible. you just sound like a pesimist.

I sound like a pessimist? That's your big comeback? I am what is called a realist. I don't think I'm being a pessimist if I say that I, personally, cannot lift an elephant above my head with one hand. why? Because the force I could exert on it could never be big enough. This is why you cannot use the kinetic energy of someone leaning in a chair to steer a subluminal spacecraft - because there simply wouldn't be enough force there. This is all forgetting the issue of lack of friction in space, of course.

The speed of light is the same.

Yes, I know this. You said, however, that the word "lightspeed" now ment 10,000 times the speed of light.

Lets just say that this time can't understand the future.

No, let's not. Let's just say that you don't know what you're talking about and as a result come accross like a man drowning in custard; flailing futilely about in hope of grasping onto anything, even though all the rescue workers have long since given up and mooched off for a cuppa.

I would have though even a toddler would understand what I said though.

Yes, that's true. Let's see. First you said:

We can travel light speed. it takes us about 1 hour to reach andromeda in an exploration/war ship

Then I pointed out that you wouldn't reach Andromeda in an hour if you were travelling at light speed. And you countered with this:

We don't exactly travel at light speed but we just named it that because people couldn't think of anything else to name it.

And your actual description of what you call "light speed" was this:

We measure light speed by 10000 light years per hour so if we travel at 10000 light years per hour we measure it like 1LYPH.

Which means I actually got mixed up a bit when saying that you'd said it was 10,000 times the speed of light. You didn't. You've said that what you call "light speed" is actually 8,760,000 times the speed of light. Or 2.626*10^16 meters per second. Or 26,261,819,320,800,000 m/s, to be more precise.

And now you're claiming that the two speeds are actually the same?

so, yes, a toddler could understand what you're saying. It's just that what you're saying is not consistant. If you're going to do this kind of thing, I suggest that you keep notes so that you can keep track of what you've already claimed so as not to get so mixed up.

So, what speed do you travel at to get to Andromeda in one hour? Why do you call this speed "light speed"? And what is 3*10^8 (AKA c) called?

Diffferent countries are more under the sea level than others so if you actually think about it it would recede different amounts.

Yeah, but not in the way that you've described. France, for example, would be landlocked with England, if what you've already said were true. And yet you say it isn't. Yet again, you're simply flat-out contradicting yourself because you don't know enough about the subject at hand.

Things are different in space.

Some things are. Atomic mass isn't. Atomic decay isn't. Halflives aren't.

No, this is not an episode of Star Trek with an anomoly of the week, waiting for some technobabble to be spoken. This is real life, and things like that don't change merely because of a lack of oxygen molecules around them.

We don't know what they did with the extra water.

What, it's a secret? Or do you just not pay attention to the major historic events of your own lifetime?

I never said dehydration was a problem.
Even if it was (which it isn't) why would we drink salty seawater?

Ah, having problems with the word "dehydration", are we? You're thinking about the dehydration of people, I'm talking about the dehydration of the planet. "Dehydration" means lack of water. You said that one of the biggest invetions of your time was dry water which, by putting out forest fires, helped solve the problem of global dehydration. And now you're saying that water was exported off the planet.

Again, it's not exactly consistant.

There is already video clips in my time.

What, of the news of this time? who recorded them all? And, if there are already videos of it, then surely you don't need to bother watching it now. You could just concentrate on your stalking.

People in my time are just smarter and more able to grasp things than people from this time.

Yeah, obviously. That's why you don't know the basic meaning of words like "dehydration" and "cryogenics", and why you can't even spell words like "course" or "thought". In fact, I'd venture as far as to say that 5-10% of your replies to my questions (when you've not just ignored the question, that is) have been along the lines of "I don't understand what you're saying".

You have no idea what our ship's engines look like or how powerful they are.
why are you theorising when you should be considering if it is possible.

Considering if it's possible? I know it's not possible. There is no friction in space. If you had just one engine on the side of a spaceship, it would only be able to push the ship sideways, not initiate a turn, because there would be a force acting on the ship in one direction with nothing to counter it. It has nothing to do with how powerful the engines are, it's to do with the fact that there are only two; one on each side.

I don't understand what you are talking about with kinetic energy.

And yet people in your time are just smarter and more able to grasp things, eh?

Do you know what kinetic energy actually is? Because you've said that that's how your ships are steered at subluminal speeds (by which we have to assume you mean speeds under 2.626*10^16 m/s, rather than under 3*10^8 m/s), in the same way as a motorbike. I'm saying that there is no way that there is enough kinetic energy there to steer a ship. You've said that it's done through the ship's systems, but then seem to have become lost and confused, presumably because you don't know what kinetic energy is.

How do the ship's systems "make it work"?

You can freeze a body the same way you freeze an element. The tranformer increases the life span of the element.

So you're saying that the freezing of bodies has nothing to do which what you're saying, and that my definition of what you meant by "cryogenics" was actually right, and that your definition was wrong in context and completely counter-productive and useless? Yes, I'll agree there.

And, we're back to the question that you've not answered in over a week. How does the "transformer" increase the halflife of the element? What does it do to it on a molecular level? I want to see an answer that discusses neutrons.

Not all elements are radioactive.

Pretty much everything is radioactive. Water is, air is, food is, skin is, ceramics are...everything is radioactive to some degree.

go back to school and learn something. I have just realised you are the most stupid person here.

This is the academic debate of the future, is it? This is how you show your maturity and professionalism? I asked for an apology for you calling me stupid last time, so you come right back and do it again? Very mature. I'm sure that all your collegues would be proud of the way that you address the issues without having to resort to ad hominem attacks, and the way that you've maintained the higher ground by arguing in a constructive fashion, rather than sticking fingers up and pulling silly faces like a little child.

I'll expect an apology for both insults in your next post.

where did I say that the reefs were destroyed by terraforming?

You said that the water around the globe had receeded because of terraforming to prevent greenhouse gases, even up to 15 miles. Seeing as the habitats for reefs are generally a lot shallower, both in absolute terms and in terms of the slope, than the coastline around Britain, the sea would have receeded more than 15 miles there. As that shallow sea is the reefs' natural environment, and you've said that that environment has been destroyed...well, it's quite easy to draw the conclusions on that one.

Or is this more of that magical gravity that doesn't work as we know it to which keeps the sea levels high around certain countrys and not others?

The greenhouse gases are gone

And way back when you were asked how, and you said by the terraforming of the ice caps. Now you're saying that the ice caps stay how they are because the greenhouse gases are gone. Not only does it make no sense, but you're talking in circles.

[Edited to add]I forgot to say the last couple of times, but the problem with killer bees (which you've said are the same as in our time) isn't that they kill off normal bees, it's that they don't fight with them. They breed with them.

 

[Rhudey]

People in my time are just smarter and more able to grasp things than people from this time.

You mean born in 1991 right?

go back to school and learn something. I have just realised you are the most stupid person here.

Excellent argument Chrono, now I definitely believe you are the best of the best, a highly educated university scholar from the future, come back to record histories events. I realize now what your top secret mission is, to rediscover spelling, punctuation and grammar! Unfortunately it looks doomed to fail.

 

[chronohistorian]

JamesAnthony-Lunarium is different to most elements.


timescholar-Even if you did call the authorities they would never catch me. I would just contact the future and have them beam me out.
What would they charge me with anyway?
How do you know I aren't using a bot to change my IP?



trollface-I am not stalking people. Just watching and studying certain groups of people.


I never said why I have to the mission.


You will have to ask about the scientific thing again because I don't understand.


I was busy so I never included that and people from my time would most probably know what I am talking about.


There is a strength suit that we have that increases your strength 20 times so in the future it probably is possible to lift an elephant.



Gravity is different in space so how do you know other scientific things like atomic mass are the same everywhere?


It must be a secret if there is even more extra water. The government only keep secrets if it is a case of military security.


Only a bit of water was exported off the planet and that was salt water because lizarans drink salt water.


Ok not all the news of this time is recorded.

kinetic energy is energy made by motion.


The transformer just does what I said. I don't know how it works, it just does what it is supposed to do.


The reefs were destroyed because of a secondary effect of the terraforming then. not a primary effect.


In the history books it said the killer bees killed the harmless bee.

 

[Rhudey]

Gravity is different in space so how do you know other scientific things like atomic mass are the same everywhere?

How is gravity different in space? Lol, I'm not sure that this is even needs a response.

The transformer just does what I said. I don't know how it works, it just does what it is supposed to do.

What's funny is that you repeatedly tell everyone on this forum that we aren't intelligent enough to understand much of what you have to say.

 

[chronohistorian]

There is gravity on earth. gravity is different on all other planets than in the solar system

 

[Rhudey]

Chrono, gravity is not different everywhere in space. Trollface, I am sure you are better suited to handle this but I will try. Here is a definition:

"The process where any body of mass found in the universe attracts other bodies with a force proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the distance that separates them. First proposed by Sir Issac Newton in 1686."

Therefore the laws of gravity are the same everywhere in the universe, the actual gravitational forces vary depending upon the size and distance of the objects. I hope this clears it up for you.

 

[Rhudey]

Chrono, I have stated this to you before: This board is a place for people who are interested in discussing the posted topics can gather and share ideas. You must have an interest or you would not be here, but you lack even the basic knowledge to understand any of it. Instead of making a mockery of this place and insulting everyones intelligence by pretending to be a time traveller, why don't you come clean and join the discussions? Asking questions would be a much better approach and many of the people here would find it much less insulting.

It seems to me that if you continue to keep this up, enough people will demand to see you banned, is this what you want?