telethapy now a reality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date


having watched a program on scientist being able to control an aircraftsimulater using only the electrical responses from the brain it ocourred to me that the same computer program could respond to words,if the respones to say ..climb can be recognised then a word such as house could also,this could then be sent via raidio to some one elses screen and visa versa if it were incripted silent comunication would be what a thoughT!!
There already is computer software that accept voice input and other software that can read e-mail and other text and generate realistic sounding audio output.
perhaps i didnt explain properly ... the computer program does not recognise voice but recognises the electronic signatures of thought ...if a library of these were recorded thought could be procesed and are ino eletrical signals understood by the software...electrodes are attached to the head to facilitate this... the {gear] is at this point large and cumbersome just like the first computers but imagine a small head set !!!
perhaps i didnt explain properly ... the computer program does not recognise voice but recognises the electronic signatures of thought ...if a library of these were recorded thought could be procesed and are ino eletrical signals understood by the software...electrodes are attached to the head to facilitate this... the {gear] is at this point large and cumbersome just like the first computers but imagine a small head set !!!
Here is a bit of info to back up what your saying friend:

Found at:

Controlling Appliances With A Thought Seen Feasible

Glancing at a stereo and turning it on with a thought may once have been science fiction, but inside a virtual world at the University of Rochester, people are listening to music by simply wishing it so.
Outfitted with a virtual reality helmet and a computer program adept at recognizing key brain signals, volunteers use their thoughts to take actions like those of any apartment dweller -- to turn on the television or the stereo, for instance.

The line of research, which links a brain and computer in a near real-world environment, may someday allow patients with extreme paralysis to regain some control of their surroundings, say the project's developers, and could eventually eliminate keyboards and computer mice as the go-betweens connecting our thoughts and the actions we wish to see in our environment.

While several teams around the world are working on brain-computer interfaces (BCI), computer science graduate student Jessica Bayliss is the first to show that detection of the brain's weak electrical signals is possible in a busy environment filled with activity.

She has shown that volunteers who don a virtual reality helmet in her lab can control elements in a virtual world, including turning lights on and off and bringing a mock-up of a car to a stop by thought alone.

Though all this is currently taking place only in virtual reality, the team is confident that the technology will make the jump to the "real world" and should soon enable people to look around a real apartment and take control in a way they couldn't before.

"This is a remarkable feat of engineering," says Dana Ballard, professor of computer science and Bayliss' adviser. "She's managed to separate out the tiny brain signals from all the electric noise of the virtual reality gear. We usually try to read brain signals in a pristine, quiet environment, but a real environment isn't so quiet. Jessica has found a way to effectively cut through the interference."

The National Institutes of Health is supporting Bayliss' research because it may someday give back some control to those who have lost the ability to move.

A person so paralyzed that he or she is unable even to speak may be able to communicate once again if this technology can be perfected, explains Bayliss. By merely looking at the telephone, television or thermostat and wishing it to be used, a person with disabilities could call a friend or turn up the heat on a chilly day.

Bayliss hopes that someday such people may even be able to operate a wheelchair by themselves simply by thinking their commands.

"Virtual reality is a safe testing ground," says Bayliss. "We can see what works and what doesn't without the danger of driving a wheelchair into a wall. We can learn how brain interfaces will work in the real world, instead of how they work when someone is just looking at test patterns and letters. The brain normally interacts with a 3-D world, so I want to see if it gives off different signals when dealing with a 3-D world than with a chart."

The brain signal Bayliss listens for is called the "P300 evoked potential." It's not a specific signal that could be translated as "Aunt Nora" or "stop at the red light," but rather a sign of recognition -- more like "That's it!"

"It's as if each neuron is a single person who's talking," explains Bayliss. "If there's just one person, then it's easy to hear what he's saying, but the brain has billions of neurons, so imagine a room full of a billion people all talking at once. You can't pick out one person's voice, but if everyone suddenly cheers or oohs or aahs, you can hear it. That's what we listen for, when several neurons suddenly say 'that's it!'"

Bayliss looks for this signal to occur in sync with a light flashing on the television or stereo. If the rhythm matches the blinks of the stereo light, for instance, the computer knows the person is concentrating on the stereo and turns it on. A person doesn't even have to look directly at the stereo; as long as the object is in the field of view, it can be controlled by the person's brain signals.

Since it's not necessary to move even the eyes, this system could work for paralysis patients who are completely "locked in," a state in which even eye blinks or movement are impossible.

The virtual apartment in which volunteers have been turning appliances on and off is modeled after Bayliss' own. Such a simple, virtual world is the first step toward developing a way to accurately control the real world.

Once Bayliss has perfected the computer's ability to determine what a person is looking at in the virtual room, the next hurdle will be to devise a system that can tell what object a person is looking at in the real world.

BCI groups are also close to surmounting another obstacle -- that of attaching the sensors to the head. Right now dozens of electrodes must be attached to the scalp one at a time with a gooey gel, but Bayliss says dry sensors are just around the corner, and simple slip-on head caps should not be far behind.

"One place such an interface may be very useful is in wearable computers," Ballard says. "With the roving eye as a mouse and the P300 wave as a mouse-click, small computers that you wear as glasses may be more promising than ever."

BCIs are divided into two categories: biofeedback and stimulus-response. Bayliss uses the latter approach, which simply measures the response the brain has to an event.

Biofeedback is a method which a person learns to control some aspect of his or her body, such as relaxing, and the resulting change in the brain can be detected. Though many BCI groups use this approach, Bayliss decided against it because people must be trained, sometimes for a year or more, and not everyone can learn to accurately control their thought patterns.

Bayliss and Ballard work in the University's National Resource Laboratory for the Study of Brain and Behavior, which brings together computer scientists, cognitive scientists, visual scientists and neurologists to study neural functions in complex settings.

The laboratory's research combines tools that mimic real-world sensations, such as virtual reality driving simulators and gloves that simulate the feel of virtual objects, with sensory trackers that measure eye, head and finger movements. Recently the lab added virtual people, robot-like actors with which volunteers can interact in a limited way.

So in the future will we all be wearing little caps that will let us open doors, channel surf and drive the car on a whim?

"Not likely," Bayliss says. "Anything you can do with your brain can be done a lot faster, cheaper and easier with a finger and a remote control." - By Jonathan Sherwood

<Contact: Jonathan Sherwood>

It's a double edged sword. If they find a way to control appliances/instruments directly from the brain, then they can easily develop instruments to control/influence the brain. There are many "Mind Control" and similar conspiracy web sites out there.