"The future ain't what it used to be."

time travel machine



Time is relative. I think it could be possible to travel into the future, but to travel back into the past-I'm not sure. Although very much like reflecting light I guess it could be possible to view the past rather than physically being there. It would take so much energy to accomplish just a minut effect of time travel I don't see how it could be done-. I believe it was Thorton that said it would take more than a hundred years of gathering potential energy from all of Earth's sources to manipulate time. I guess through future technology it might happen.
Yeah well don't believe every thing you read.

UFOs are impossible too. The thing I can't figure out is how do cattle cut off thier own lips, core out their anauses and land on deserted mountain tops.......all without the incumberance of ANY whitnesses.......(or even 'wormholes' for that matter).
<font size="1" color="#FF0000">LAST EDITED ON 17-Jul-01 AT 12:38PM (EDT)</font>

well.....if you want to time travel how can you make a time machine,and where will you get the energy to run it and how to dematerialize it,and to go to the future?
Ive got a question.
You belive that traveling to the future is possible, but not the past.
In that case:
If you traveled into the future, how do you plan on getting back?
why could you travel forewards in time but not backwards...? what REALLY makes the difference...if you traveled forewards you would not meet yourself...only you would age less, your not actually traveling but preserving
<font size="1" color="#FF0000">LAST EDITED ON 23-Jul-01 AT 07:36PM (EDT)</font>

"It would take so much energy to accomplish just a minut effect of time travel"
("I don't see how it could be done.")

*Alright, I guess it's a fair assumption that it would take a great ordeal of powerful energy perhaps equatable to that of planets, or the sun perhaps, however it may be done by extracting those powerful energy bursts right from the quantum vaccum of space! How? try using Electro-Magentic Field focusing techniques for starters! believe it, or not, this is being done as I wright this message because somwhere in a quiet discussion with a PA. based research group, they are in the development stages of negotiating contractual arrangements with other private companies to jump on this conceptual module' to design, and construct actual working prototypes of this concept-to-prototype EMF conducive constrictor plasmatron infusion reactor, to produce limitless amounts of overunitized power from a single generator that can provide sufficient power to run an entire 12 story hotel, or a small home, and the generator itself may vary in size from that of something the size of a 4x4 pickup box, to the size of a shoebox.
(Kiss fossil fuel consumption to generate electricity Goodbye!)

"I believe it was Thorton that said it would take more than a hundred years of gathering potential energy from all of Earth's sources to manipulate time. I guess through future technology it might happen."

Not necessarily so! (let me explain)
the earth itself generates a combination of strong & weak subatomic particle collisions that eminate upwards from within it's core of molten metals, as they rise they gather electromagnetic current in the form of EMF radiation that spews outward, and engulfs the planet forming what is known by many physicists as the earths "Electro-Magentic Energy Grid" there are available electroencephlagraphic meter devices that work like metal detectors, or radiation geiger counters to pick up readings eminating from within this EMF grid to detect with percision, (compiled with GPS technology) to read the strongest EMF signals being transmitted which fluctuate in pulses at a rythimistic harmonic frequencies @ 12hrtz. the tricky part is synchronizing your device to chime within similarly percise variables to that of which is being transmitted from within this EMF grid, once you have succeded, you might open a hole that will increase the density without increasing in mass into an infinitive quantum dot. It is through these methods we intend to open a potal through the quantum vaccum that should also prove to have multiapplicationary functionality.

<hr size="1" width="80%" color="#000099" align="left">"Everything you know,...is Wrong!
soon we shall all discover the truth."
Dear Skeptic,

Perhaps this will be more convincing.

The strength of a magnetic field is proportional to the inverted square of it's radius. S=1/r^2. As you can see if you decrease the radius to zero the strength would rise to infinity. Unfortunately the limit to how far you can focus a magnetic field without splitting or breaking the field is plancks length. If focus a field down to it's swartzfield radius then the force of gravity rises to sufficient strength to accelerate a mass to the velocity of light in that the strength of the gravitational field within the swartzfield radius is strong enough to keep a mass that is traveling at the velocity of light from breaking free of the gravitational pull of the singularity. The equation to find the radius a mass must be compressed to inorder to create a black hole was ,and I could be wrong here as my history is a little fuzzy, Professor Swartzfield back in the 40's. The equation he discovered goes as follows: Sr=gm/c^2 where g, is the gravitational constant, m is the mass of the object, and c is the velocity of light. Now keep in mind that this equation was written for energy in the form of mass like a stone, not for energy in the form of energy like a magnetic field.

However since Einstien showed is that energy and mass are interchangeable...e=mc^2, we can use the convert the "'m'..mass.." in gm/c^2 into it's energy equavalant and solve for the swartzfield radius for a magnetic field which is energy in the form of energy.

Here Goes....




I think I did the math wrong, if I am wrong then the correct equation is ge/c^2=Sr. I will get back to you on this.


Edwin G. Schasteen...I will finish in my next post.
Dear "aussieman1" (BJM)

Tough luck for you. Renaldo is history. I'm still here.
I think you have it bakwards. If someone wnats to go back into time, they could because what happened all ready has. But going into the future is the problem. Since the future is an ever-changing maze of possibilities, there'd be no way to know if you where in the future of your reality, or if you are in another parallel reality. And apon returning to the past, your choices could difert the reality from occurring, thus causing a temporal paradox. As for energy, plans are under way to create a device which could harness the gravitational powers of a black hole. Surf some other websites and you can examine this idea in detail.
Actually it would take a year of the combined energy from the known universes suns to create enough negative energy to bend space in relative time let alone to go foward or backwards in time =)
I have been doing some more work on the mathematical mechanisms involved with point theory.

The latest mathematical formulation yields a possible methodology to interconnect a series of singularities mathematically using inequality equations.

I don't have time to go into it now, but will complete this post on my next transmission.


Edwin G. Schasteen
Here is my current working idea for time device check my site for flow drawings
Computer Time Server or CTS.

Concept: Set up a dedicated computer time server ( linix box would be nice more reliable
check walmart.com for $299 box) with battery back up and all redundant back up possible
this would sink to atomic clock through phone or gps.

Step one: Construct message program that will send text or Morse code pulses or test
pulses at a precise dedicated time, this would be possible for current and future time. In
other words enter simple message and then enter time of transmission (insertion) then time
of reception (released time). The first step would be to get this box to work with in itself.
In other words to type test message then send in 5 minutes the program would do itself,
than receive in 3 days. You have just sent a message to the future. So far this is similar to
a time announce or digital assistant program. A wake up call if you will (but with your
message). Also a complete log would be kept of transmitted and received pulses.

Step two: Send message back in time.
Enter message time of transmission than time of reception, the message would then leave
on a digital or analog I/O card (basically a card that interfaces your computer to external
hardware similar to remote control devises or PLC’s Programmable logic controllers)
this message would be inserted into the external Hardware i.e. (transmitter /receiver)

External hardware: This is the tricky part, obviously the computer is always on ready to
transmit and receive from this external device. It must be left on and message event must
proceed at a designated time. At first it would be easier to send a series of cascading
counting pulses that vary each transmission so you can decipher when in the future that
pulse would occur. Example you no that on Tuesday 1000 hours it will send 10 pulses so
if on pre-Monday you receive 10 pulses you have received a message from the future
(assuming theses pulse have come from your external hardware not internal from the
computer remember the computer can send pulses forward through time not back) This
future event would be controlled by the computer not you! no time paradox here, like I
forgot to type the pulse so how could the past receive it.
External time box this is where I am brain storming. The box would transmit/receive
Light, RF, Radiation, Particles or what ever method or modulation proves time
susceptible, it good be an accelerator or decelerator (absolute zero). maybe the reflections
of the past would be show in the future (remember we are talking simple pulses here) This
external hardware would also need to be vary reliable, always on so to speak.

To me this is the elemental basis of  a workable time server or traveler, the pulses travel
they are better equipped to do it..

Pro’s: No time paradox, no living matter, simple pulse transmission- reception
Con’s: no proven time transmitter (at least for sending to past)

Please send me your ideas for time transmitter or field generator to transmit into,
sendto: [email protected]        “Vision through electronics.”   I am planing to build in
my garage, not joking, if it doesn’t work out, hey I still get some good electronics out of
the experiment. :)
Project title:  Time Server Project
related equipment,  Time server, Time reference, Time transmitter.

Imagine sending the lotto numbers to the past! HAHA that would cover the costs!

This is a new idea as far as I know, I thought details of it yesterday , although ever since I
started in broadcasting I entertained the idea of transmitting through time and how to do
it. My recent contract computer work and knowledge tied the transmitter to the server in
my mind, mainly for logging, tracking and analyze, recording and timed transmission and
so on.

Let me say this project is in the conceptual stage (its only been one day of official work on
the time server).
I did a time search on MSN for time travel and it lead me here.
Let me say I know transmitters I have worked and tested, trouble shooted full power TV
and FM transmitters analog and digital, I was a chief engineer for a TV station for over
ten years. I have a AAS degree in broadcast electronics. I also am a certified commercial
electrician and not to bad with computers I built (put together) the one I am using now. I
say this not to brag (it was a lot of work and study) but to establish some creditability as I
have read a lot of wild posts in this area. (which is good let freedom ring).

Look for a web site (geo cities) soon (for real) under search word vistronics to present
this and many other ideas. I lost or someone ripped off my Hand spring Visor platinum
PDA, so some ideas are lost (yes I back up but I got hit with the lovebug virus and had to
reformatt both my computers than I took a trip with out backing up anyway....)

On to your comments,
The core idea is to send numbers (code) through time.
If you will, think, of a time “SETI” a “search for extra temporal transmissions”, instead of
extraterrestrial. The movie contact showed a form of this when they replayed the “Hitler
TV broadcast”, not like what I propose, but you get the idea.

I think this idea will work because its electrons, or particles or a Light wave or a RF
envelope that is doing the time travel (what ever method by trail and error experiment
proves itself.)

I mean lets start at the beginning, you know take baby steps, before getting online and
saying I got a time machine you can jump in.
Like Marconi in the early radio days with a spark gap transmitter, did he build a TV
transmitter? No but it lead to it. Exact parallel to the Time Server.

Much of what I described uses existing technology, but to transmit through time you need
a hole or a field (maybe you do not need this), a zone of non-temporality, a door so to
speak (or a peep hole), you know what is great about this idea is only needs to be a pin
hole to focus your RF (High F microwave) Beam or it could be laser, or modulated Ions
like in a klystron transmitter Particle Beam. Again trail and error experiments, scientific
observation of data, hard work and experamentation is needed.
Do you think some one just sat down and dreamed up TV?

I have several Ideas for the Time transmitter, one borrows from the alternate energy
people, of High speed spinning magnets, creating magnetic fields in a cylinder (of varying
polarity), and what is happening at the center of this field, the middle of this cylinder?
could this be the place to focus the message beam? And what if we density modulated this
area with a klystron beam?. Which is contained by magnetic force? Would the remnant
show through time? what of the harmonics? What about a microwave beam? Instead of
magnets what if we used super high voltage to generate a field 250KV plus? What then?
Do you know?  To create fields of this power and intensity require a lot of power 480
Volt AC 3 phase at a hundred amps. (Imagine that wired to my garage LOLL)

This Idea may not work, but with out experiment I can not say. But I have 2 more of my
own ideas for the transmitter not to much related to above. (notice we have not talked yet
about the receiver)

I am a big fan of OPEN SOURCE so share your ideas.
I am a applied technology guy I want generate data drawings ect.
I like to wax Philosophic sometimes but I am here for nuts and bolts and planning.