Time travel through time dialation and wheels.

[time tunnel1]

I believe that the government is using pi and some of modern day mathematics to cover up the secret of time travel.Which i have found.That is why you cannot find out how to time travel.

 

[time tunnel1]

6 inch radius that goes 6 inches per hour

3.1416/6=.52361/2=.261805/3 radius divided into three.Then divide 3 into 261805=.07933

To find the circumfernce do this..07933x2=15866x3.14=.49819

This would make a even better time machine.

 

[AuditorMaterial1]

Hilarious. Been away from TTI for a while and now I come back to see a belabored thread that digresses into education on basic math. I know why my family is home-schooling our son, but is the public educational system this bad, or did we have someone on here who didn't get math in primary school?

 

[Einstein]

It is the educational system. It almost seems that terrorists are in control of what gets taught. Making sure that future generations will not be competent enough to comprehend anything.

 

[Darby]

Hilarious. Been away from TTI for a while and now I come back to see a belabored thread that digresses into education on basic math. I know why my family is home-schooling our son, but is the public educational system this bad, or did we have someone on here who didn't get math in primary school?

Auditor,
Yes it is just that bad. Ray and I have commented on this subject on the forum for years. People have ideas, post their thoughts about them and have absolutely no clue whatsoever about the science or math underlying the topic therefore they can't understand why their ideas can be easily dismissed. It's not entirely their fault but they (as adults) support the system that propagates the insanity.

Thus we are left with the Dr. John Baez (UC Riverside) Crackpot Index:

A simple method for rating potentially revolutionary contributions to physics.1. A -5 point starting credit.

2. 1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false.

3. 2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous.

4. 3 points for every statement that is logically inconsistent.

5. 5 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful correction.

6. 5 points for using a thought experiment that contradicts the results of a widely accepted view.

8. 5 points for each mention of "Einstien", "Hawkins" or "Feynmann".

9. 10 points for each claim that quantum mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without good evidence).

10. 10 points for pointing out that you have gone to school, as if this were evidence of sanity.

11. 10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying how long you have been working on it.

12. 10 points for mailing your theory to someone you don't know personally and asking them not to tell anyone else about it, for fear that your ideas will be stolen.

13. 10 points for offering prize money to anyone who proves and/or finds any flaws in your theory.

14. 10 points for each statement along the lines of "I'm not good at math, but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone to express it in terms of equations".

15. 10 points for arguing that a current well-established theory is "only a theory", as if this were somehow a point against it.

16. 10 points for arguing that while a current well-established theory predicts phenomena correctly, it doesn't explain "why" they occur, or fails to provide a "mechanism".

17. 10 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Einstein, or claim that special or general relativity are fundamentally misguided (without good evidence).

18. 10 points for claiming that your work is on the cutting edge of a "paradigm shift".

19. 20 points for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel prize.

20. 20 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Newton or claim that classical mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without good evidence).

21. 20 points for every use of science fiction works or myths as if they were fact.

22. 20 points for defending yourself by bringing up (real or imagined) ridicule accorded to your past theories.

23. 20 points for each use of the phrase "hidebound reactionary".

24. 20 points for each use of the phrase "self-appointed defender of the orthodoxy".

25. 30 points for suggesting that a famous figure secretly disbelieved in a theory which he or she publicly supported. (E.g., that Feynman was a closet opponent of special relativity, as deduced by reading between the lines in his freshman physics textbooks.)

26. 30 points for suggesting that Einstein, in his later years, was groping his way towards the ideas you now advocate.

27. 30 points for claiming that your theories were developed by an extraterrestrial civilization (without good evidence).

28. 40 points for comparing those who argue against your ideas to Nazis, stormtroopers, or brownshirts.

29. 40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved fame, or suchlike.

30. 40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on.

31. 40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.)

32. 50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.

We see #14 "I'm not good at math, but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone to express it in terms of equations" all the time. I think that you'll see it above in this very thread.Like it or not, to understand physics you absolutely have to understand the math. No debate necessary.
We also see #15 "10 points for arguing that a current well-established theory is "only a theory", as if this were somehow a point against it" just about as often as 14. Our schools also fail to define for students the meaning of [insane] opinion and scientific theory. There's a bit of a difference between the two terms.

 

[iwnt2kw]

Wheels cause greater time dialation close to their center and less at their outer rims. Here is a diagram of this.http://www.pasteall.org/pic/79853

i get what your trying to say somewhat I believe the concept that your thinking about Is the same concept that is used in a nuclear power plant And also uaed in a centrifuge Because the spinning of things has the tendency of causeing them to age (just like its done to uranium in a nuclear power plant , and like its done to blood in a lab centerfuge in or to seperate it into its prime components Sort ofBy the use of artificial and production of artificial gravity And the exertion it has on matters structure Which is that it causes matter to age or break down to its more simple components, I am an inventor a hands on person when it comes to knowing things And yes i do think You are on the right path Cause i can tell You who else is trying to exploit that same concept And this person is R. L. Mallette That physicist from that university of Conecticute (his time machine) And im exploiting the spinning thing to I think its called centripicle force In 3different inventions im working on And all of them could get me killed Thats how serious they are And no i dont know that much about mathematices Cause I like to see the affects of the science that i do with my oun hands right in front of me And not on a piece of paper with a pencil either

Sorry guys theorys, hypothosies, guesses, and assumptions are all good But you need to make sure that you do alot more hands proof Cause it helps you more And the time tunnel Well there is a time machine thats been already built which uses that same concept And if R.L. Mallette gets his built Thought he doesnt know it yet but there are some parts still missing to his machine but he will find out Then there will be two of them But I already know whats going to happen to the second one Its going to be faught over And its ot going to be anything pretty

 

[iwnt2kw]

Sorry about my missed spellings