What's new
New posts
"The future ain't what it used to be."

Topics Limited to 11 Pages?

((For instance, he has stated that his society is not involved in space travel. He's also stated that the temperature in and around his device while in use is approximately 100 degrees (approx 375 kelvin). ))

I’m not sure I understand the connection between no space travel and the temperature around the device.

((If the Hawking Radiation of a black hole stated in Kelvins is…))

The singularities are not unstable; therefore, uncontrolled evaporation is not possible. In addition, there is no extemporaneous matter near the singularity that would cause it to give off radiation or heat.

((Or - he's taken a slice of the Earth about 1.2 miles wide at the equator from pole to pole down to the center of the Earth and compressed it into a singularity. And his machine has two of them, GE has a larger unit (C206) and there are multiple machines of each model (C204 & C206). ))

A singularity about the size of an electron would only require the mass of a large mountain. The singularities inside the C204 are much small than that. And no, I didn’t make them.

((If his society doesn't space travel - then they are gobbling up the Earth to make their singularities.))

You know… E = MC squared can be written to solve for mass too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
TT_0,
I am not sure what you mean by unstable or stable when it comes to a singularity. I asked before if this was suppose to be a naked singularity or one which in fact has an event horizon? If it does have an event horizon, then Hawking radiation is a natural phenonmenon which you can not prevent, it is the result of virtual particle pairs form at the event horizon something which can not be prevented. Darby is correct to point out that the evaporation rate is inversely related to the surface area of the event horizon, so if you have such a small black hole it should not last long at all before it evaporates.
The mass an object has presumably comes from the coupling of its particles to the Higgs field. If you were some how able to increase the coupling of a particle then you in theory you could make it more massive. Or if you were able to decrease the coupling make it less massive. Although, currently there is no concrete i.e definitive evidence of the Higgs boson's existence. There is some indication at LEP at CERN but it is disputed. We should definitely know within our lifetimes though, since the LHC will come online in 2006 with more than enough energy to find the Higgs boson if it exists.
 
TT_0,

I am not sure what you mean by unstable or stable when it comes to a singularity. I asked before if this was suppose to be a naked singularity or one which in fact has an event horizon? If it does have an event horizon, then Hawking radiation is a natural phenonmenon which you can not prevent, it is the result of virtual particle pairs form at the event horizon something which can not be prevented. Darby is correct to point out that the evaporation rate is inversely related to the surface area of the event horizon, so if you have such a small black hole it should not last long at all before it evaporates.

The mass an object has presumably comes from the coupling of its particles to the Higgs field. If you were some how able to increase the coupling of a particle then you in theory you could make it more massive. Or if you were able to decrease the coupling make it less massive. Although, currently there is no concrete i.e definitive evidence of the Higgs boson's existence. There is some indication at LEP at CERN but it is disputed. We should definitely know within our lifetimes though, since the LHC will come online in 2006 with more than enough energy to find the Higgs boson if it exists.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought you all might enjoy this...
*(TT_0, do you recall any mention of this?)

“Time Travel”
How Science Can Finally Make It Happen.
Discover Magazine
April 1992
( Note: Cost of this Magazine during publication, was on sale at local news stands for: $2.95)

Below is a link to where I uploaded the scanned images from the magazine containing this article. (More To Come Latter.)
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=2c0c8d9a5d60e75c735c3aa24020166e&threadid=2705

If you have any problems with the link, you can always goto http://www.exosci.com
(science forums]science]frontier physics)
 
I thought you all might enjoy this...

*(TT_0, do you recall any mention of this?)

“Time Travel”

How Science Can Finally Make It Happen.

Discover Magazine

April 1992

( Note: Cost of this Magazine during publication, was on sale at local news stands for: $2.95)

Below is a link to where I uploaded the scanned images from the magazine containing this article. (More To Come Latter.)

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=2c0c8d9a5d60e75c735c3aa24020166e&threadid=2705

If you have any problems with the link, you can always goto http://www.exosci.com

(science forums>science>frontier physics)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm really starting to doubt that you are from the future TT0. The fact that you won't answer my simple questions has drawn me to this conclusion.

Sigh...
 
I'm really starting to doubt that you are from the future TT0. The fact that you won't answer my simple questions has drawn me to this conclusion.

Sigh...

 
Dear Deathwind,
Most of your questions are already answered in "time travel paradoxes" and on Art Bells board. Its unfortunate that you came on board so late. John (TTO) is preparing to leave and he just wants to spend some time alone with his family. Out of respect for him I am posting this for you. I don't think he is really planning on answering any more questions, up to the point he made his announcement to leave.
He wont give "leaders" names for the obvious reasons,it could put their families in danger at this time.
If there is a letter you would like to forward to your self in 1998 I would be happy to forward this on to him.
sincerely,
pamela



<This message has been edited by pamela (edited 13 March 2001).>
 
Dear Deathwind,

Most of your questions are already answered in "time travel paradoxes" and on Art Bells board. Its unfortunate that you came on board so late. John (TTO) is preparing to leave and he just wants to spend some time alone with his family. Out of respect for him I am posting this for you. I don't think he is really planning on answering any more questions, up to the point he made his announcement to leave.

He wont give "leaders" names for the obvious reasons,it could put their families in danger at this time.

If there is a letter you would like to forward to your self in 1998 I would be happy to forward this on to him.

sincerely,

pamela

[This message has been edited by pamela (edited 13 March 2001).]

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ya know, i think back in 1998 april, back right before StarCraft came out...i received a message in my email that said it was from the future, and it said to play starcraft. i probably just shrugged it off cause starcraft hadn't come out yet...but i know that if i send a message to myself the message is going to say "Play starcraft and get very good at it".

hmm..

sigh...
 
Ya know, i think back in 1998 april, back right before StarCraft came out...i received a message in my email that said it was from the future, and it said to play starcraft. i probably just shrugged it off cause starcraft hadn't come out yet...but i know that if i send a message to myself the message is going to say "Play starcraft and get very good at it".

hmm..

sigh...

 
Last edited:
Richar18:

"Daviper and Darby: There is no paradox in what you propose, if you were to accept the multiple universe theory."

...but ...

You see,...

I don't!

For the same simple reason that I don't accept "Pyramid Power". Or The Tarot as a predictor of the future. Or even Astrology for that matter.

Why?

Simple.

Because there is not one shred of evidence that any of it is true to the degree that it can be demonstrated repeatedly, predicted accurately and then documented correctly as to just exactly how it is so.

You know. Like Time Dilation. Which has undergone ALL of those conditions and PROVEN to be a fact of physics and life and the universe.

And many other things I could easily exceed the 11 page limit on this board describing.

But Multiple Universes, Parallel Universes, or Multiverse Theory (as it has come to be called), is not a theory at all. It is a Hypothesis in SEARCH of a theory. An easy explaination for that which we do not understand. A catch-all answer for the unknown. But being an explaination (as a POSSIBILITY) for why things are the way they are does not constitute proof, fact or even a viable alternative if it can't be demonstrated reliably. And Multiverse "Theory" can't even be demonstrated at all. Let alone reliably.

We could say that every time an Airplane takes off it flies because all the people aboard "will" it to be so. It WOULD explain flight. Except for the fact that it's not so. And the flight of the airplane can be easily demonstrated by other means that ARE demonstrable, reliable, and predictable.

Or we COULD say that invisible rubber bands explain gravity. It WOULD explain it for sure. But it wouldn't make it so.
 
Richar18:

"Daviper and Darby: There is no paradox in what you propose, if you were to accept the multiple universe theory."

...but ...

You see,...

I don't!

For the same simple reason that I don't accept "Pyramid Power". Or The Tarot as a predictor of the future. Or even Astrology for that matter.

Why?

Simple.

Because there is not one shred of evidence that any of it is true to the degree that it can be demonstrated repeatedly, predicted accurately and then documented correctly as to just exactly how it is so.

You know. Like Time Dilation. Which has undergone ALL of those conditions and PROVEN to be a fact of physics and life and the universe.

And many other things I could easily exceed the 11 page limit on this board describing.

But Multiple Universes, Parallel Universes, or Multiverse Theory (as it has come to be called), is not a theory at all. It is a Hypothesis in SEARCH of a theory. An easy explaination for that which we do not understand. A catch-all answer for the unknown. But being an explaination (as a POSSIBILITY) for why things are the way they are does not constitute proof, fact or even a viable alternative if it can't be demonstrated reliably. And Multiverse "Theory" can't even be demonstrated at all. Let alone reliably.

We could say that every time an Airplane takes off it flies because all the people aboard "will" it to be so. It WOULD explain flight. Except for the fact that it's not so. And the flight of the airplane can be easily demonstrated by other means that ARE demonstrable, reliable, and predictable.

Or we COULD say that invisible rubber bands explain gravity. It WOULD explain it for sure. But it wouldn't make it so.

 
Last edited:
Here is something really interesting.
I went back to look at the "time travel paradoxes" thread and I noticed the missing pages from page 11 have showed up at the end.
investigating the situation I went back and read some pages and noticed that there were some postings deleted. I noticed there were two posts that I made that had several postings between them are now gone. and my postings are right next to each other now.
so in conclusion when someone deleted those postings (and several others)it made room for the missing pages to appear. someone must have deleted quite a few postings to provide for that much room to be put back on page 11.
sincerely,
pamela
 
Here is something really interesting.

I went back to look at the "time travel paradoxes" thread and I noticed the missing pages from page 11 have showed up at the end.

investigating the situation I went back and read some pages and noticed that there were some postings deleted. I noticed there were two posts that I made that had several postings between them are now gone. and my postings are right next to each other now.

so in conclusion when someone deleted those postings (and several others)it made room for the missing pages to appear. someone must have deleted quite a few postings to provide for that much room to be put back on page 11.

sincerely,

pamela

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey Pamela!! You are correct in your ascertion that your posts have been moved and changed on P.11 of the Paradox thread!!
Why and who would have done that, I don't know, But I do know that's not the way the posts that made it on P.11 origionally. Quite the discombobulation, but it could have been alot worse, the whole thread could have been deleted......

Well, gotta go, HAVE A GREAT DAY!!

PEACE FROM THE MATRIX OF LIFE!!!

~ Draco the Druid

p.s. GODSPEED TTO!!!
 
Hey Pamela!! You are correct in your ascertion that your posts have been moved and changed on P.11 of the Paradox thread!!

Why and who would have done that, I don't know, But I do know that's not the way the posts that made it on P.11 origionally. Quite the discombobulation, but it could have been alot worse, the whole thread could have been deleted......

Well, gotta go, HAVE A GREAT DAY!!

PEACE FROM THE MATRIX OF LIFE!!!

~ Draco the Druid

p.s. GODSPEED TTO!!!

 
Last edited:
TT_0...I noticed in the second photo (in the dark)
it appears, that you was holding in your left hand, a pen-laser & pointing it in the direction to your window, seated on the right front side, of the vehicle.

Was that a "Cigar" you were holding in your Right-Hand?

<This message has been edited by Time02112 (edited 19 March 2001).>
 

Similar threads

Time travel_O
Development of a time machine
2 3
Replies
51
Views
2K
Time travel_O
Time travel_O
Num7
If you were a time traveler in 2024, what websites would you visit?
Replies
3
Views
215
Num7
Num7
Cosmo
11/22/63
Replies
1
Views
258
Cosmo
Cosmo
autoscopic
A simple, readable collection of Titor's posts.
Replies
2
Views
401
Num7
Num7
Num7
What Would Make John Titor's Story Even Better?
Replies
0
Views
144
Num7
Num7
Back
Top