I know that when I posted here a couple of years ago, claiming to be the “real” “John Titor”, I was met with healthy skepticism and some outright denial, especially because the full story contradicts some of the major points in the posts and chat logs online. As I stated previously, those aren’t due to temporal anomalies or alternative worlds, but because very little of the original story was true, by way of a conspiracy by individuals with at least one C204 from a point in the relative near future trying to put a lot of misinformation about the future online to, amongst many other things, try to prevent or change future events. I should be clear, some had virtuous intentions, and didn’t want the coronavirus pandemic to occur, even if others were trying to do things like change the outcomes of elections or otherwise create an advantageous outcome for selfish reasons.
All of that aside, I recently became aware of something that may serve to some as proof in what was an obvious reference to me and my name, Richard Marin. It turns out, and some of you are far more familiar with the story of the show Stein’s Gate, that the character with the identity of John Titor goes by another alias at one point, that of Rinrin NyanNyan, what appears to be a direct homophonization of my name. Now, that show is completely fiction, at least as far as the real machines and real narrative goes, relative to the events as I’ve experienced them, but I’ve been told that the naming is intentional.
You’re also welcome to try to run that song, Life On Mars by David Bowie, by as the answer to that question, but if you’re interested, I can support my claims in other ways, like describing the science, at least in part, as I’ve done in another thread, or by checking with IBM to verify my family’s personal history with that company. Like I’ve said before, some of the elements are true, such as the GE time machine from the real future, but some are not, like the history of future conflict that was meant to be disruptive to established events. Remember, the posts and online presence edged up right to one of the biggest negative events in recent history, the September 11th attacks, and I don’t believe that is a coincidence.
For my part, I have communicated to the federal government both my claims and some of the real interference by criminal groups in what has been a years long retaliation campaign against me, not just for coming forward but for the knowledge I have about the future and future technologies. As I stated earlier, I believe that the real reason that they picked me, when I was a teenager and not able to really speak for myself other than the narrative they gave me, was because of my near, now, future involvement with developing those technologies with GE. If anyone from there is monitoring these posts, or from the government or other interested parties, I want to state clearly that I have only the best intentions and truly believe that the technologies can change the world for the better, ending scarcity and conflict, which is often caused by scarcity. Matter to energy to matter technology is more than a gravity displacement unit, it’s the technological advance behind teleportation, matter replication, and far more.
There’s a reason and urgency to my posting, and it’s because I believe that I can help.
Are you familiar with the term unfalsifiable?
I don’t ask that to be condescending, but to suggest to you that what you are claiming is not falsifiable.
It is hard enough to talk about John’s claims because they were arranged in a way that ultimately avoided decisive falsification. For instance, Civil War by 2004, at the time can’t be tested, after 2004, people figured he was a hoax because it didn’t happen. Divergence explanation seemed more convenient to the lie rather than verification.
However, your claims are even more untestable and impossible to observe.
Moreover, you do not write like John, you write like everyone else, a lot of nothing to say.
You spoke a little about 9/11, but I bet you haven’t figured out why John would know nothing of that event. You didn’t even bother learning any of his cadences. E.G. Greetings, A great deal of, or you may find this interesting.
I mean, you may in fact be a John Titor, seeing that part of his claims implies that a c204 unit would give you the ability to return a minute in the past and take with you a different you endlessly. So, sure, you could be, but I don’t feel you are the one people are familiar with.
Still, let’s say you are the very same, what do you want to get out of your time here?
I want to debunk the lies. Basically everything about the future that the individuals who were running the scheme, including a man who allegedly died last year, a horrendously evil man who forced himself into everyone’s stories and claimed, to be a military commander, was false.
Look, I wrote differently when I was 13 and not all of the posts were actually me. You need to drop the whole idea of the canonical John Titor because it was a hoax. The only truth in it that I can see is that the C204 was, and will be, a real machine. The technology is from the near future and will likely be at some level of, remember from the plans, classified production within the next decade. I did some research on GE and their product coding and it fits their real documentation format and TMIM is an acronym apparently in use by then now.
Do you want to know where the claim that there would be a civil war came from? They showed us the movie Civil War that came out a few years ago and claimed that it was a real documentary. Do you want to know why there was so much talk about it causing problems with the 2008 election? Because he and his allies were trying to subvert the election results which they knew would occur based on the real future historical record.
Look at the claims in the original story as intentional lies and compare them to the historical record and it will almost seem like it was the exact opposite of what had happened. That’s intentional. It was written in a way to hinge off of real events but attempted to introduce fractious perception and drive polarization into the political discourse.
If a time traveler from the future turned up and told you that something would or wouldn’t happen in the future, even if you didn’t believe them, it would put those ideas in someone’s head at a higher level of consideration than a regular post on the internet. Their intention was to change the future because they could not control the future and they wanted to.
There is no such person as John Titor, the individual known as Kay Titor is not in any way connected to me and is part of the hoax, and the “commander” of the group was a monster whose motivations were criminal beyond sane and rational belief. I cannot state how much that man intentionally chose to harm, deceive, and subvert other people’s free will and very little of that is clear from the public story.
I won’t lend more time to that man than he has already stolen. What I will do is confirm details of what I’ve learned are the discrepancies between the facts and the fiction.
The C204 is a real technology. A similar unit was apparently used in The Philadelphia Experiment and that didn’t work at all because it was not rated even close to safe at power input and scale for a vessel of that size. The group attempted to force it’s way into an ancillary role to the government and claim that they were helping from the future.
The truth couldn’t be further from it. There is a trail of footsteps littered through history of those people and attempts to stop them. Some of the world’s actual mythology has been influenced by that conflict. Thinking of modern human history on the scale of thousands of years and recognizing that just one incursion point to the past can introduce factors that align to the intentions of the traveler and see how negative the intentions of that group was and you will begin to get some idea of what kind of intentional damage they have done.
This is a broader conversation about more than near-future world history. This is the answer to big questions, real anachronisns, and some of the biggest historical mysteries and controversies on record. What happens when an evil group gets ahold of time machines? How can you tell the difference between history in it’s natural occurrence and history affected more directly by time travel? Sometimes it’s not so clear because time travel is a natural feature of the Universe, as Wheeler’s “single electron theory” is basically accurate.
So is Novikov Self-Consistency, so they couldn’t even change the future even if they wanted to. An utter exercise in futility with the sole intention to cause harm. Idiocy.
That’s why I’m trying to expose this now, because they’re actively doing it in the past with relation to my present and present posts. Think of it like a time window - using video tapes from the future in the past to try to interact with, learn about, and change the future. They are an active threat from the past attempting to impede the future and harm everyone in it in the past where their actions can’t as easily be stopped.
Maybe this is more interesting than the original story, and it’s definitely going to be more consistent because it’s true. There is no John Titor, but time travel is real. It will be one of the most important inventions in human history and that’s why so many people have tried to steal if, subvert it’s intentions, or take credit for the developments and research that accomplishes it.
If anyone reading this has any sort of recollections about being contacted by that group, I’d be happy to answer questions. I have found numerous reports and posts on the internet about this and real future events. Many of the posts on Reddit speculating about 2027 are accurate. Real future information is easy enough to find on the internet if you know where to look.
There are always time travelers, and local authorities, monitoring this site. It’s one of the safest places on the internet to safely discuss time travel, from my experience. That’s why I’m doing so now.
You wrote quite a bit, but there is not much to engage with yet. You make substantial claims without really developing them into a clear argument or conclusion, and when people push back even slightly, you seem to retreat from defending the points in detail. At the same time, you continue posting these long tangents despite knowing most of the feedback you receive is critical.
From my perspective, the increasing frequency and style of the posts gives the impression that you may go through periods where you become especially fixated on these ideas. Even your profile presentation contributes to that impression. I am not saying that to insult you — just explaining honestly how it comes across.
That said, I do not mind engaging with it because I genuinely enjoy discussing these kinds of topics. I just think the narrative itself needs more structure and direction right now. At the moment it feels circular, like it keeps returning to the same assumptions without building toward anything concrete.
P.S. I am not trying to offend you. I am simply giving my candid impression.
I don’t think that any of what you’ve said is accurate. I’m happy to engage with specific questions and have expressed that. I’ve also offered proof, what proof is actually available with relation to the truthful elements of the story. Like I said, though, a lot of it was a lie, and people expecting to get truthful answers to those elements will be disappointed because there aren’t any, just the context of the intent from why those lies were told and where they came from.
I fall towards the same mindset as Jay_Walker with your messages. But the last thing I wish to do is double team you. I feel that never lets anyone speak the way they wish & instead causes defencisim “i may be using that word wrong here, but i think you understand how I meant it”
Please don’t think i am saying that none of this happened as you have said, it is also not my intention to offend, Sorry if I do.
From what I see, i see contradictions in some things you say/said… but they just may just be my perspective because I am missing some elements, that would clarify.
We know “John” is not real as a person, it is a title only “in a sense” we are also aware that more than one “John” uses that title, at least I think everyone knows by now. you claim to be a “John” also in title, are you real? This is the little contradictions that are weird for me about when you speak.
I can see this being correct & had wondered this myself in the past. before of all this “john” talk for me & sticking my head back in to start making the connection.
So this is not quite news to me. I just can’t prove it. So I kept that to myself. I do not like to think of the that experiment, or what is said happened*/still happens* to some of those men, it is a horror show to my mind & makes me sick.
what’s new.
I am not negating evil actions because in my eyes choice, is… choice, even if there is determinism at play. We choose, to me that is free will… point blank
See to me this is a problem, You contradict!
I can not wrap my head around, determinism… free will. either it was always meant to be so they had no choice & no free will, or they choose & we can hold them accountable. I always felt Judas had a free will, even tho Judas chose his path, Jesus tried to give him ways out… all the way. Jesus knew the future. Judas didn’t. He chose his way on his own in spite of everything Jesus did to save him & why should he/Jesus have bothered, since He/Jeus knew his/judas fate? Because Jesus still chose to do what’s right & try anyway.
determinism/choice. We choose our ways here “leading ultimately” to either heaven, or… hell. but others can help thwart, or… help, which paths we take. But we choose.
Either these people know they can’t change anything, cause they didn’t or… I am not sure what you say for sure they think they can do. Either way, they have time travel they should know by now what limits it may have, or the only world they can affect, or multi~worlds is correct & they know that & “you just don’t believe it” that is why they keep trying to change the past.
You never addressed mandela effects. If the past can’t be changed, why do we/some have them.
Maybe in this crazy world, free will & detreminism = the same thing. Who knows anymore. “Not I” said the silly blue chaos butterfly!
I will just lay back in the cut & watch more as you speak… as you see fit. I will no longer bug you about this, unless I feel I must. Sometimes I say things I shouldn’t & i know myself well enough to say, I am sorry when I am wrong. So if I have been wrong… I Am Sorry! ~QS
Yeah, I am gonna have to just read & just listen more first. I am completely missing something when you talk, i just have to be. I “want to understand”* what you are trying to do, please do continue. ~QS
*edit to what/how I said that… because I feel I said it wrong at first.
It’s not a title, it was always referring to one person. There was only one person, a person attempting to impersonate the character on Reddit, who I believe has ceased doing so. The name comes from Jan Itor, the janitor from Scrubs, which was one of the shows from the future that we watched.
The Novikov Self-Consistency Principle and a physically deterministic Universe. Also, there’s a great video from Veritasium on “Path of least action” which I’ve found explains how matter, and people for that matter, path select. It’s not precisely free will, but despite that, it’s the closest we actually get.
Memory issues, alternative branding campaigns, old commercials, and sometimes seeing the future before it happens. I remember a lot of news from the future that I didn’t recognize until it occurred as founded in that. Practically everything I’m watching now is something I’ve seen before due to time travel and just how much of the future they tried to have us watch and learn about.
There’s a point at which that will end, probably in a couple of years, because they only could have shown us that much real and fictional bits of the future. Until then, every day is basically deja vu for me. I thought at first it was a time loop until I recognized something much more simple - they watched ahead in an effort to change it or make people, with fake videos, think something else would happen.
Zero point of reincarnation doesn’t mean that everyone else is me, it means everyone else was me. You are all yourselves and that’s the most important thing in life - to be you. Don’t lose perspective on that.
If everything I said was inaccurate?
Is there or was there ever… a call to action?
a person that you can point to?
event that you can reference without being cryptic and vague?
specific examples of how Titor lied, or
specific details of how Titor influenced people to do bad things?
any details for what he did wrong?
specific details about the harm from time travel people are doing now?
details about the wrongs that need to be righted?
specific examples of how that effects anyone else?
I could go on, but my point is, there doesn’t seem to be a story here.
But, if you can answer any of the questions above that might make it easier for people to engage with you in a more serious way.
I’m coming forward now because it’s newsworthy and I want the full true story to be known so the group that put forward a lot of false information, including actively deceiving the US federal government for at least decades into believing that they were a legitimate group from the future, is exposed and stopped.
The “commander” of the “unit” was a man named Leslie Alan Cambey, who died last year. He was a Cambridge physicist, later involved in the publishing industry. He falsely claimed for decades to the federal government and others that he had invented the time machine and that was why he had access to it. He was an absolute, unrepentant, monster, who hid it by using a memory altering drug known as hyoscine, which has long been used by “intelligence” agencies to cover up crimes and illegal actions. If there is any one person responsible for the “hoax” of John Titor, it was him.
The story was formulated specifically to try to prevent President Obama from being elected in 2008, but some of the individuals were told that it was meant to prevent coronavirus, some told it was going to have a wider affect on the “timeline”, some told it would prevent President Trump from being elected in 2016. Basically, any lie that they could stick because what it was really about was attempting to place themselves in a “necessary position” where the government and the world would think that they had access to the literal powers of gods through future technology and that they would keep them safe. In the end, it was a protection racket and most of the actions that they were claiming that they would protect them from were actions of their own doing,
Like I said, if there is any person who is the sole identity of “John Titor”, it’s me. I took this photo below of my grandfather, Tony Taurisano, Sr. holding a cigar in front of the active C204 to show the effect of the magnetic field. I’m also including a photo of him from a family album to show him face on. The C204 photos, at least of it in the Camaro, were taken in Smithtown, New York. He wasn’t the grandfather who was involved with the IBM 5100, but for years basically all of my family was contacted by time travelers or known to the future because of a large amount of records of the future in the past. I am the person who was answering the questions on MIRC, mostly, the person who was logged in under Timetravel_0 most of the time, which they apparently named after this username, like “patient zero” for time travel, and the one who they generally introduced to people as “John Titor”.
It isn’t generally known, but I interacted with a lot more than the internet during the period of time that this was going on. Eventually it will come out as to just how many people have interacted with or know about time travel, but that will be more likely as time gets a bit closer to it’s invention.
I didn’t lie or do bad things, but I was 13 and repeating a story that they had told me and they were. It wasn’t my grandfather who formulated the story, it was Cambey, mostly. Think about the political polarization that has occurred between the “John Titor” posts and today. That isn’t a coincidence. I can answer more in terms of specifics if questions are raised.
They’re trying to change the past and control the present. It’s having such a disastrous affect on the world that people were getting nightmares, perceiving events that seemed to be time loops up until mid-2019, and have been violating their own ethics, boundaries, and have been so negatively affected that authorities, through international bodies and on their own, are investigating and responding. I have been central to this and it’s not just because of the “John Titor” story.
I posted this in another thread, to give some sort of idea of what kind of damage they’re doing:
The point is that the past isn’t changeable and attempting to change things is the conflict. For example, they’re actively, in 1996, trying to prevent something that occurs in 2028. What that means for them is to cause as much harm to the people involved and put as much doubt as possible into their heads then, sometimes even torturing them or far worse, to prevent that future event. It’s not going to work, but for them even if it doesn’t, they’re intending to hurt those people as much as possible. Time travel used as a weapon puts the tragedies in a person’s past that they often had no seemingly real reason to explain.
I’ll give a specific example, citing what’s happened to me directly. In 2009, I was briefly brought to the UK, ostensibly to start a new career that would have put me in the entertainment industry. I ended up in the background of a few productions and I believe that I ended up on-screen at least once. They even put me in an apartment, put me around people who were around the same age as myself, and tried to get me to be in a relationship with someone there. That all happened, but what happened next was that I was kidnapped shortly after and returned to America.
What they were intending to do was to prevent the future. The people from the present doing it knew that I got married in 2012, knew that I got divorced in 2023, and knew that I spent most of my life working in offices. They thought that if they could take a vulnerable moment in my life and attempt to put me around what they thought would change the trajectory of my life, even, from their perspective, for the better, even if that’s against the will of where all of those people, including myself are in the present, it would change future events.
It won’t, it hasn’t, and I remember all of those things having occurred, which is extremely frustrating when I try to explain it to them in the present, and the people in the past from the present, that their attempt to do what they’re doing is not just wrong, it’s harmful. Even if - and it isn’t possible - but even if it was possible to change the timeline from the perspective of an earlier year, you would be altering something big enough that would cease people who exist from existing. It’s not ethical in any sense of the word even if it were possible.
Predestination is never an argument for action. Every person is acting from their present, but even when they are being controlled, coerced, or otherwise manipulated, those actions are tied to the action points of that control, coercion, or manipulation.
I’ll give another example of what they’re doing. They’ll take a present or near-present technology, such as memory viewing technology that induces the user to view a memory of someone else, or a nightmare, or a fictional simulation, similar to a deepfake generated with their own mind, put them in that state and tell them that it’s all real or that they’re really that person, or really were that person, or really will be that person in a future life so they really have the right to make choices for them. This technology is possible with present or near-present scientific knowledge, but I suspect it’s from the near future. I’m being told 2032, and that tracks with my awareness of it’s development. With a time machine from 2028 or around there, they can just go ahead a bit and use it.
The problem isn’t the technology so much as the intention with the machines to attempt to change the past and obfuscate the truth so much that someone in 1996, or 2008, or even 2026 believes that everything they are being told is true at the face value. They’ve been telling people that Star Trek is the real future and that for it to be real some level of horrifying things need to be done or come to pass and they’re using smaller and bigger lies than that to get the results they’re looking for, or think they’re looking for. If you’re even familiar with the canon of that series, it puts a major nuclear war in the next decade or so and that doesn’t happen, but some of the people involved either don’t care or want something like that.
It’s not manipulation of time with time travel that’s the problem, it’s manipulation of the truth, which is where the John Titor story came from, where the Lyndzee Grummond story came from, and why so many people popped up claiming that they were the “real” John Titor and that the entire narrative of that, plus some, was real. It’s a disinformation campaign and they’re using real time travel to go back into people’s pasts, gain their trust, and manipulate them.
For my part, I’ve been working on channeling that time locked document, called The Proclamation and yes, heavily inspired by The Shadow Proclamation’s articles from the TV series Doctor Who. It may even be a real reference, in advance, as I was very close to the television show both growing up and when I was in the UK in 2009. They are also considering, based off their lie that Star Trek is the real future, the Articles of the Federation that were published years ago and are available online, real law, but they’ve balked whenever I quote Article One and The Temporal Prime Directive at them, so I know that whoever is really telling the people involved what to do don’t actually consider any law, especially the United States Code of Federal Regulations, Constitution, Bill of Rights, or even the UN Charter to be particularly binding to their efforts.
The big problem is that a few people with extremely bad intentions are manipulating a lot of people with good intentions and lofty ideals. What makes it worse, not just for me but for the others who are trying to tell those good people that there’s something drastically wrong going on, is that they believe the lie and they have done everything they can to make that lie sound like a truth. Not just an acceptable truth where the ends justify the means, but the best possible truth, the goal of all of humanity and life itself and that no part of what they’re doing is wrong or could even be believed to be wrong. Couple that with plenty of people who seem more than willing to violate their personal ethics, or not present any in the situation to begin with, and you have a very, very dangerous combination.
The big lie - and this is important - is that “Many Worlds” statement. It was really a misquote of John Wheeler’s single electron universe theory, which it is accurately stated in. There are no parallel dimensions or a multiverse.
They told that lie to people so that individuals with real knowledge of the real future, or knowledge of themselves, would doubt it and be more likely to believe false statements and more likely to act on false information, believing that it could or would “change events”.
The “single electron universe” and Many-Worlds are unrelated theories by different people. John Wheeler proposed the single-electron idea in a 1940 conversation with Richard Feynman: the thought was that one electron zigzags through time, appearing as every electron moving forward and every positron moving backward. Hugh Everett III, working under Wheeler’s supervision nearly two decades later, proposed the relative-state formulation (later branded “Many-Worlds” by Bryce DeWitt). MWI was never a misquote or pop-science corruption of Wheeler’s earlier idea. They address entirely different problems—particle identity versus measurement—and the timelines do not overlap in any way that would support your narrative.
Single-electron is where the term “wordlines” came from. That was why they had later had the claim in one of the posts that “Many Worlds” was true. It isn’t, single-electron is and the term “worldline” became conflated with the concept of the multiverse, which is almost a comically bad interpretation of it’s intended value.
I have a very high opinion of President Obama and recognize that the group that was doing this, and still is, wanted to try to change events because they did not. That wasn’t it for all of them, some were deceived into wanting to change the future for other reasons, like preventing the Trump Presidency, too, so I want to make it clear that this isn’t about politics, it’s about the wrongest possible uses for time travel - to change things that aren’t your choice to change.
I’m going to answer that question the same way as previously. It’s a personal event and it’s usually supposed to be someone around the same age range as the groom.
The term worldline (Weltlinie) was introduced by Hermann Minkowski in his 1908 lecture “Raum und Zeit” (Space and Time). In special relativity, a worldline is simply the trajectory of a particle through four-dimensional spacetime — the set of all events xᵘ(τ) parametrized by proper time. It is a geometric tool of classical relativity, predating quantum electrodynamics by decades and entirely unrelated to either Wheeler’s later speculation or Everett’s interpretation…
~QS
Yeah, I am gonna have to just read & just listen more first. I am completely missing something when you talk, i just have to be. I “want to understand”* what you are trying to do, please do continue.
~QS