What is odd to me, I remember hearing about a history “don’t quote me I missed a few classes in history” one where something didn’t happen in my original history “pearl harbor”.
I can’t help but wonder, if time was suppose to be one way & was changed from that “what was in the original history”, then changed to the one I remember, then changed back after I was alive, hence the three swap thing, & now it is being changed more to reach a particular outcome.
Maybe the original, or as close to it without certain things still taking place.
~QS
1 Like
@JudasTitor I watched this movie upon your suggestion. They seriously did all that work just to not do any work??
Maybe we cant change the past?
I think we can.
Just imagine the possibilities. A war machine that massive totally out of place. You dont think it has the potential to change something?
I think you cant change your past and will never be able to navigate back to this present once you start screwing around in the past.
You can find heaven on earth if you want to, or hell if you choose to.
Probability dictates that if you visit enough timeliness you will eventually choose a winner or atleast something that can be turned into a winner. @JudasTitor
You have a limited amount of jumps using the C204 & the CO2 scrubber SCUBA system.
@JudasTitor Just remember Time Travel + Immortality =s Infinity
If only our machine were immortal. There are likely several stranded C204s in the US and Europe right now.
1 Like
When applied to chronistics, the argument runs much like the search for extraterrestrial intelligence: if time travel into the past is physically achievable and future generations eventually unlock it, the statistical probability of our era being unobserved, unvisited, or unrecorded by tourists, historians, or researchers from tomorrow approaches zero. The total absence of verified chrononauts is used to argue that the technology is fundamentally barred by nature.
However, several theoretical workarounds and constraints could explain the empty room without entirely closing the door on retrocausal mechanics:
– The First-Generation Limit: One of the most mathematically consistent constraints on closed timelike curves is that a time machine can only transport information or matter backward to the exact moment the machine itself was first activated or constructed. Under this model, future civilizations might eventually build functional temporal engines, but because none existed prior to that breakthrough date, visitors can never reach any point in history before that initial activation.
– The Chronology Protection Conjecture: Formulated to preserve the foundational causality of physics, this hypothesis suggests that whenever spacetime bends enough to form closed loops, quantum vacuum fluctuations step in. As a pathway to the past nears macroscopic stability, energy densities spike toward infinity, creating a localized feedback loop that self-destructs the apparatus before transit can occur.
– Branching Timelines and Divergence: If retrocausal travel operates via a many-worlds or branching framework, a traveler moving backward does not enter the exact past of their originating universe. Instead, their arrival instigates a quantum split, creating a divergent timeline. In that scenario, our specific timeline might simply be one where no external interventions have yet integrated, while the travelers populate parallel histories entirely invisible to us.
– The Temporal Prime Directive: Advanced intelligence or future human societies may recognize that tampering with or revealing themselves to earlier epochs introduces catastrophic causal feedback loops, information contamination, and systemic instability. Strict containment protocols and stealth mechanics would make observation entirely undetectable.
– Thermodynamic and Informational Barriers: Reconstructing a macroscopic macrostate from a prior configuration requires navigating staggering entropy penalties and computational resource ceilings. Even if spacetime geometry permits the shortcut, the energy cost to anchor a stable bridge across macro-temporal intervals could remain forever beyond practical limits.
A few people believe time travel into the past will be possible by the 31st century and the “parallel universe” theory is true.
