I belive that there was not so much a problem as to whether or not the HDR would work or not, but the liability imposed both by rhyme use of the HDR, so effecting the possability of a person going zero without a TTA?
Also as posed by Gary Voss in mutuail conversations with others, a past poster here in past conversation; since the HDR progets an E.M. field, is there possably an infractional profile placed by the HDR's standard operation, placed upon both the salt cell structure of the kidneys and or the in-body held electrolyte solution within the body?
There seems to be operational liabilites so posed by these said senarios?
M.C.