With all the alien stuff in the news over the past year, you'd think I'd have begun more threads about it here. Aliens and UFOs are one of my favorite subjects, but stories come and go so fast that it's hard to keep up... Or sometimes I'd rather wait and see where it goes before I open my mouth about it.
David Grusch took me by surprise when he came out with his story, but I don't trust him.
If you don't know who Grusch is:
David Grusch is a prominent figure who recently emerged with claims of a UFO cover-up by the U.S. government. His story came to light earlier in 2023 when journalists Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal published a detailed account of his allegations on The Debrief, a website focusing on "frontier science".
Grusch asserts that the U.S. government secretly manages a UFO retrieval program, possessing multiple alien spacecrafts and even the remains of their non-human pilots. Furthermore, he alleges evidence of white-collar crimes to hide these UFO programs and has hinted at them using murder to maintain their secrecy. He reached out to the director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, with his findings but felt his concerns were not adequately addressed.
His claims, which also suggest the potential interdimensional origins of these UFOs and malevolent activities associated with them, have been publicly presented in interviews with various media outlets, including a Congressional hearing in July 2023. Notably, his allegations have received some validation from notable figures, including a retired Army colonel and a current U.S. intelligence official.
However, a critical aspect of his claims— the idea that extraterrestrials are malevolent or violent—feels misaligned with broader logic to me.
Governments have long been suspected of manipulating narratives to maintain control and ensure public compliance. By casting extraterrestrial life as hostile, it offers a convenient avenue for the government to perpetuate a state of fear, thereby justifying tighter control measures. An external "threat", particularly one as incomprehensible as beings from another world, provides ample grounds for Patriot Act 2: Alien Boogaloo.
Regardless of that, throughout history, humanity has exhibited aggression, both towards itself and the environment. When we consider our track record, it’s not a far stretch to question whether our interpretations of extraterrestrial behavior (if that's what this fear mongering is based on) might be filtered through our own lens of mistrust and fear. If these beings truly posed an imminent threat, given their presumably advanced capabilities, wouldn’t they have acted already? They've been here for hundreds or thousands of years, right?
Maybe he means Lizzid Peeple like Hilary Clinton, reptilian shapeshifters from NIbiru.
I find it more likely that Grusch is perhaps a "limited hangout"—providing just enough information to draw attention away from more significant revelations or to shift public perception. Controlled disclosures can be used to divert attention, laying the groundwork for upcoming agendas, and molding public sentiment to accept a certain narrative, especially one that amplifies fear and demands for protection. We've all seen that before.
Grusch’s allegations should be met with skepticism. It's imperative to differentiate between genuine whistleblowing and whatever this guy is doing.
David Grusch took me by surprise when he came out with his story, but I don't trust him.
If you don't know who Grusch is:
David Grusch is a prominent figure who recently emerged with claims of a UFO cover-up by the U.S. government. His story came to light earlier in 2023 when journalists Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal published a detailed account of his allegations on The Debrief, a website focusing on "frontier science".
Grusch asserts that the U.S. government secretly manages a UFO retrieval program, possessing multiple alien spacecrafts and even the remains of their non-human pilots. Furthermore, he alleges evidence of white-collar crimes to hide these UFO programs and has hinted at them using murder to maintain their secrecy. He reached out to the director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, with his findings but felt his concerns were not adequately addressed.
His claims, which also suggest the potential interdimensional origins of these UFOs and malevolent activities associated with them, have been publicly presented in interviews with various media outlets, including a Congressional hearing in July 2023. Notably, his allegations have received some validation from notable figures, including a retired Army colonel and a current U.S. intelligence official.
However, a critical aspect of his claims— the idea that extraterrestrials are malevolent or violent—feels misaligned with broader logic to me.
Governments have long been suspected of manipulating narratives to maintain control and ensure public compliance. By casting extraterrestrial life as hostile, it offers a convenient avenue for the government to perpetuate a state of fear, thereby justifying tighter control measures. An external "threat", particularly one as incomprehensible as beings from another world, provides ample grounds for Patriot Act 2: Alien Boogaloo.
Regardless of that, throughout history, humanity has exhibited aggression, both towards itself and the environment. When we consider our track record, it’s not a far stretch to question whether our interpretations of extraterrestrial behavior (if that's what this fear mongering is based on) might be filtered through our own lens of mistrust and fear. If these beings truly posed an imminent threat, given their presumably advanced capabilities, wouldn’t they have acted already? They've been here for hundreds or thousands of years, right?
Maybe he means Lizzid Peeple like Hilary Clinton, reptilian shapeshifters from NIbiru.
I find it more likely that Grusch is perhaps a "limited hangout"—providing just enough information to draw attention away from more significant revelations or to shift public perception. Controlled disclosures can be used to divert attention, laying the groundwork for upcoming agendas, and molding public sentiment to accept a certain narrative, especially one that amplifies fear and demands for protection. We've all seen that before.
Grusch’s allegations should be met with skepticism. It's imperative to differentiate between genuine whistleblowing and whatever this guy is doing.
Last edited:
