gamerz,
A problem that at least I have in responding to one of your posts is…well…typified by your OP in this thread. You’ve tossed out a dozen different topics in a single paragraph. Pearl Harbor, atomic bombs, space aliens, ancient aliens, secret ships, Titor, MiBS, WWII, Carl Allen, teleportation, mythical tech,
ad nauseum. All in one paragraph? WTF? How does one respond to that? Can I suggest that if you have a question that you focus. One topic per paragraph, which is actually a large part of the definition of the word “paragraph.”
So I’ll just respond to the Eyesview Episode 5 video. Here’s a link to their long ago abandoned web page:
whereisjohntitor - YouTube The boys originally contacted me in 2010 and I gave them the information about the PO Box in Celebration and the link between this site, its owner MOP (Raul), the township of Celebration, FL, Disney Corp and Larry Haber that was present on this site long before Titor/TTO came onto the scene. The nonsense about his son and his brother came from someone else who just had to drag real family members into the fray. Today you can go to jail for that in some countries. The boys were well briefed by me, they had substantial background information and had an interview set up. And even though they were admittedly out “to debunk the time traveler” (their exact words at the opening of Episode 1) they blew it. They were young, amateur video journalists who were nervous doing the interview. They let Haber manage the flow of information during the interview and completely forgot to ask the key questions. While Haber says in Episode 6 (the interview) that he was just the attorney for Momma Kay Haber and had no idea how anyone could possibly connect him as an individual participant in the story, the boys knew better. I gave them the common email address used by Haber, the John Titor Foundation, the group that wrote the Titor book and Ben Z. As I recall it was
[email protected]. (See below) But they let him get away with his story without asking him the key questions even though they knew he was not being forthright with them. Next they made an absolute rookie mistake. As journalists what did they want from an interview? They want to interviewee to slip up and “say too much”. Apparently Haber did say too much and had it on camera. Days later Haber called them and convince them to delete that section of the interview. They had a scoop and let it go. If Larry Haber said too much that was his screwed up, not theirs. They were not obligated morally, ethically or legally to delete anything. And that was the one and only interview they ever had with Haber.
Anyway, they produced Episodes 6 through 13 and that was that. None of it was very enlightening or even interesting. After Episode 13 they never posted another thing on the channel.
NOTE: I didn’t post the full email address because it was abandoned years ago and is now being used by a regular person. My fear, justified by being involved with this for just short of a quarter of a century, is that some chucklehead would take the opportunity to harass the current holder.
